Do you support of oppose Capital Punishment?

Question

there are many reasons to oppose it and to support it. I would like to know both. There are also religions that teach that death penalty it okay and some that say its not. so just give your personal opinions. make it detailed!

Answer 1

It is not proven to be a deterrent.
Does anyone seriously believe a murderer stop and think " if I do this I could get caught and get the death penalty"?

Generally it is racist
More people of color are sentenced to death than whites who committed the same crimes under the same circumstances.

Used more as revenge
Many death row inmates would rather die and get it over with than continue to live. It does offer revenge (notice I did not say justice) to victims families

Mistakes are made
Several inmates on death row are found to be innocent after spending many years on death row. If they had been murdered by the state an innocent person is killed.

Religious
Thou Shalt Not Kill

If it is wrong for one person to kill why is it okay to kill when it is done by the state.

Who would watch?
Would you be willing to watch or pull the switch that would take another person's life. Even if you did not know either convict or victim? Or is it out of sight out of mind therefore okay to deal with? Do you think it would be popular if executions were televised? Maybe some people would be ghoulish enough but I consider myself more civilized than that.

Even lethal injection is being examined as cruel and unusual punishment.

The United States is the only industrialized first world nation that still does it. Do others know something we don't or are they more civilized?

Answer 2

I disagree with that place, yet i don't think of this is unavoidably inconsistent. the two situations could nicely be famous on the muse that capital punishment is performed on someone who has finished something (theoretically) culpable sufficient to forfeit his or her perfect to existence. You boost the factor that the harmless are in specific circumstances performed, and that's a sturdy factor, yet of direction those circumstances are errors and not the unsleeping purpose of capital punishment. you should retort that killing a minimum of a few innocents seems to be inevitable if capital punishment is used with any frequency, however the supporter ought to argue that this unlucky loss is justified by potential of the sturdy that comes from ridding the international of wrongdoers and deterring destiny wrongdoing. I disagree with that calculation, besides the undeniable fact that it somewhat is a minimum of internally consistent. i'm against capital punishment because of fact i don't think of it somewhat is a extra clever deterrent than existence imprisonment, and because i don't have faith that retribution is a ethical sturdy. I additionally don't think that the lack of harmless people's lives is justified. i'm professional-determination because of fact i think of it somewhat is sparkling that a fetus isn't someone. this is not sentient, and hence does not have self sustaining ethical value.

Answer 3

I support it - but I also think that it could be better maintained. Someone shouldn't sit 25 years on death row while they exhaust frivolus after frivolus appeal, eating taxes for those that do have a strong case for appeal. I also think that appeals should be limited. 3 appeals max, and no more than 10 years, and then put to death. Remove the 'comforts' such as tv, etc.
You take a life - you deserve to lose yours.

Answer 4

I'm against it. I think death is too good for some criminals. After all, it's eternal peace. I think they should be locked up for life, no chance of parole, no TV, no radio, no mixing with other prisoners, etc. Now before you say it's cheaper to execute, you better double check. It actually costs more, because of all the appeals. And even if it wasn't, do you think you would ever see any of the so called saved money?

Answer 5

Support, cant be religious reasons, why??? how many Christians out killing in a war this latest war, past wars. I believe it should be like we did with Saddam, make it quick, if you want the death penalty to work do it faster!!!!!!, California has over 600 death row inmates, it takes years to get an attorney to just file your first appeal. Ridiculous, yes we make mistakes, it's like they say in "THE WAR" collateral damage, why if OK in war not ok if a person plans, tortures, rapes and kills your loved one or you.??????????

Answer 6

When it's a terrible despicable crime and you know 100% that the person did it, then I think it's ok. But don't let them sit on death row for 10 or 20 years. Just get it over with.

Answer 7

i think its very hypocritical to kill someone for killing another.. i also think as a society we should rise above these people who take from us by not allowing ourselves to succomb to our want of vengeance against them, and instead try to find justice.. and i think a lifetime in prison is very just

but ive fortunately never lost anyone to a crime that would warrant the death penalty.. that may certainly change anyone's opinion

Answer 8

lets ignore all the moral aspects and the religion and cut to the bottom line--------it costs much more to execute criminals than to imprison them for life. throw in a handful of wrongful convictions, and you have no reason to support death sentences.

Answer 9

I oppose it...no man or woman should have the power to take anothers life...

Answer 10

Support, didn't always, but when I child gets raped and killed a person's viewpoint can change.