How did Wilson’s basic principles of progressivism differ from Taft’s or Roosevelt’s?

Question

Also, can anyone help me out with these questions, I need help for my histoey

1. In what ways was Wilson’s foreign policy an extension of the idealistic progressivism he pursued in domestic policy?

2.What were the essential qualities of Wilson’s presidential leadership in 1913-1914?

3. Why did Wilson’s foreign policy fail to prevent further American interventions in Latin America?

4 How did Wilson’s basic principles of progressivism differ from Taft’s or Roosevelt’s?

Answer 1

This is an easy one:

1. Roosevelt advocated his programs with force (Big Stick Diplomacy)
2. Taft advocated his programs with greed (Dollar Diplomacy)
3. Wilson was an idealist who believed that all people were basically good inside and would make correct choices of their own volition. Of course Wilson was terribly taken advantage of at Versailles and never accomplished some of his greatest goals because of this naive attitude.