English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Depending on whose "Wedding Ring" it is! and where he choses to wear it. I don't think knuckles even anything to do w/ it as long as the parties involved are happy.

2007-03-06 13:28:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, but neither men nor women are obligated to wear wedding rings, hairy or hairless - unless they both agree to.

Deciding to wear or not wear rings is a personal choice; it should not be based on what others think.

2007-03-06 18:43:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No... if he expects his wife to wear her ring then it's only right that he should wear his. He could shave or wax them. lol :-)

2007-03-05 22:37:45 · answer #3 · answered by Butterscotch 7 · 1 0

lmao, uh no.

if its that bad just have him tattoo that bad boy on there. personally (speaking as a married woman), i think all married men should be tagged for migratory purposes.

could come in handy....hee hee.

2007-03-05 22:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by ☆MWφM☆ 7 · 2 0

no you can size around the hair lol as long as it doesnt jump too many sizes up from hair alone lol

2007-03-05 22:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by mala 3 · 2 0

Only if it interferes with his swinging on the tire.

2007-03-05 22:49:28 · answer #6 · answered by Palmerpath 7 · 2 0

I don't see why it should..... :-)

2007-03-05 22:32:39 · answer #7 · answered by yuuki chan 3 · 2 0

Nope not at all

2007-03-05 22:34:27 · answer #8 · answered by Panda 4 · 2 0

Only if it annoys him.

2007-03-05 22:32:39 · answer #9 · answered by Smarty Pants™ 7 · 1 1

Ha ha, no-- but he should wax!

2007-03-05 22:30:50 · answer #10 · answered by from HJ 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers