Depending on whose "Wedding Ring" it is! and where he choses to wear it. I don't think knuckles even anything to do w/ it as long as the parties involved are happy.
2007-03-06 13:28:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, but neither men nor women are obligated to wear wedding rings, hairy or hairless - unless they both agree to.
Deciding to wear or not wear rings is a personal choice; it should not be based on what others think.
2007-03-06 18:43:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No... if he expects his wife to wear her ring then it's only right that he should wear his. He could shave or wax them. lol :-)
2007-03-05 22:37:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Butterscotch 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
lmao, uh no.
if its that bad just have him tattoo that bad boy on there. personally (speaking as a married woman), i think all married men should be tagged for migratory purposes.
could come in handy....hee hee.
2007-03-05 22:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ☆MWφM☆ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
no you can size around the hair lol as long as it doesnt jump too many sizes up from hair alone lol
2007-03-05 22:32:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by mala 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Only if it interferes with his swinging on the tire.
2007-03-05 22:49:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Palmerpath 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't see why it should..... :-)
2007-03-05 22:32:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by yuuki chan 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nope not at all
2007-03-05 22:34:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Panda 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Only if it annoys him.
2007-03-05 22:32:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Smarty Pants™ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ha ha, no-- but he should wax!
2007-03-05 22:30:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by from HJ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋