English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

If everyone had the exact same resistance to disease, then any disease which could kill one of them would kill all of them. Bummer.

If people have different resistances to different things, then there's a possibility that even if something can kill of most people, it's less likely to kill them all off.

A good example of this is the HIV virus. It eventually kills most people who get it... but there are some few who are just completely immune to the thing. If we had never discovered any treatments, then it might have been those few people who carried on for the rest of us. Or at least their genes would probably have spread wildly until most of us had a version.

So it goes.

2007-03-05 14:14:20 · answer #1 · answered by Doctor Why 7 · 1 0

In-adaptability

2007-03-05 22:11:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

those that have the variation that is best suited to the 'changed environment' will be the fittest. it follows the idea of the 'strongest survive'.

2007-03-05 22:08:52 · answer #3 · answered by monchicha 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers