As far as epic midieval battle movies go, how you think the movie "300" will compare to "Lord of the Rings"?
2007-03-05 13:40:31 · 4 answers · asked by fhqwhgads_sibbie 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Considering neither film were "mideval battle movies" the question is moot.
"300" will have more fighting than Lord Of The Rings, but the plot will not be as spectacular. Face it, LOTR had 60 years of fan build up. "300" had maybe 10 at the most.
2007-03-05 14:00:55 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the cinematography is very, very good. its like a comic book that is get into the big screen. my friends are actually waiting for it to be shown. as per storyline, LOTR has a better story. but for the battle scenes, i would go for 300.
2007-03-05 21:50:17 · answer #2 · answered by sit on a bench 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
300 looks like a complete disaster.. no one is excited for it like they were for lord of the rings...
also 300 seems to lack plot
2007-03-05 21:43:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
those monsters look pretty sweet in 300 but i still think LOTR kicks butt! haha i used an acronym for lord of the rings................... NO I AM NOT A DORK!
2007-03-05 21:49:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋