In favor.
The arguments for a decent minimum wage recognize that the economy exists to deliver societal benefits. The minimum wage says that as a society, we recognize that there is a minimum value to labor and that employers who will not pay that minimum are not engaged in an enterprise that is beneficial to society on balance.
The arguments against minimum wage are based on economic theories that have a certain intuitional attraction. However, they are unsupported by real world data. That is, it has not been shown in the real world that a minimum wage that has resulted in adverse macroeconomic effects.
2007-03-05 13:58:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Justus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am for the minimum wage but I do not expect it to be a living wage. Any one who thinks it's not enough has not put the effort into making their place in life better and do not derserve the benifits afforded to us who have. It is good to have an established minimum but this is only the beginning wage. Want more? Work for it. Get an education.
2007-03-05 13:02:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sheriff of Yahoo! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
politically, it sounds benevolent, but regulation of wages bucks the laws of free economics that ultimately hurts minimum wage employees.
Once u raise min wages, employers have to pass along those increases to customers. this squeezes employers so they usually wind up employing fewer workers. this is the short loop. The long effect is an impact on inflation (remember min wage employment is the backbone of all developed industry- barring illegal migrant labor, which nobody knows about), which ultimately just bumps the price of everything up, meaning some of those min wage gains are lost.
2007-03-05 13:02:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am for a mininmum wage (Although it should be raised, i agree) because without one, an employer could pay anything they wanted to. I do beleive that the minimum wage has to go up a certain percentage when the cost of living expences go up. I dont remember where i heard that though.
2007-03-05 12:58:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Minimum wage is very important, has to increase according to cost of living.
2007-03-05 13:00:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Expression 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
a million.you're taking the main menial of jobs and pay the guy a "minimum salary" it somewhat is frequently floor sweepers, examine out people,protection guards etc. 2. the companies that pay this could desire to value sufficient for their centers or products to pay for this provider and nonetheless make a income. in the event that they're paying a contractor, then the fee is even greater. So regardless of they produce on the corporation is going up. 3. whilst the fee of that product is going up, the shop has to boost the fee to the customer (jointly with THE minimum salary worker) to cover HIS value of paying a "minimum salary". 4. people pay extra for the product, so they whinge that they at the instant are not getting sufficient on minimum salary to purchase the products or services, so the government will boost the minimum salary! 5. It starts back at form a million. above, and IDIOTS think of that they are turning out to be A boost! the reason that there is help for elevating minimum salary is as a results of the fact maximum of th UNION contracts are tied to minimum salary as some style of indicator. The Union provides money to Democrats and different Socialist/Communists and in return the Democrats save elevating the minimum salary so the UNIONS will gets a commission extra. the folk who get harm are the folk who somewhat artwork for a living.
2016-10-17 08:55:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes minimum wages to be paid after considering cost of living/prices index as practicable.
2007-03-05 17:20:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am alwayas against minimum wages.
2007-03-09 01:44:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Debananda M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm for raising it. No one can live on the current min wage.
2007-03-05 12:53:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lisa S 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I AM FOR IT TO PREVENT EXPLOITATION OF THE UNDER PREVILEGED BY THE RICH AND THE PREVILEGED.
2007-03-06 16:13:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by NQS 5
·
0⤊
0⤋