I find hte phrase to be homophobic. However, what's with these "straight" guys sleeping with guys? Seems pretty gay to me. How could a "straight" guy get arroused to another guy if they were straight. And, I don't buy the Kinsey Scale ether. Sexuality is VERY black and white.
2007-03-05 12:19:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Dean, that's the kind of comments I would assume with from a straight guy.
2007-03-05 12:23:03 · update #1
Wrong. I'm sorry. Straight guys who sleep with guys because they are desperate, need money, or have nothing else to do? Please...I'm not buying it. It's funny to even state!
2007-03-05 12:32:30 · update #2
I’m a gay guy and I know there’s no way I could force myself to have sex with a woman. If I was desperate for money I could kiss a female, but not get aroused sexually. So I’m guessing it must be the same with straight men and gay sex. There must be a little bit of bisexual in them or they wouldn’t be able to get aroused.
2007-03-05 13:00:25 · answer #1 · answered by MrCute 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sex roles. Sex as in gender. People do NOT have a hard time with the idea of the possibility of a lesbian having sex with a man. (This is where someone is bound to point out to me that men and women are physically different, and that a man must be able to achieve and maintain an erection in order to have sex. I'm getting there... :)
Think for a moment about role playing and fantasy, and the power of the human mind in the world of sex. Don't under rate it! Sexuality is not black and white... it is many and varying shades of gray. Or rainbow hued (if you'll forgive the implication). Society has different roles and expectations for people based on their identified label. A lot of folks do not give credulance to bisexuality... they see it as a transition from identifying as straight to identifying as gay. Some people may actually fit that bias... but many do not.
My personal belief is that sexuality is simply rife with ambiguities. But societial and personal definition aside, there is a LOT of power in touch and a LOT of power in the mind. I think that most of us use that power in our sex lives, but try not to think about it too much otherwise 'cause it directly messes with our definitions. I've often wondered... If a person (regardless of identified sexual orientation) were blind folded and (completely at ease, of course) submitted to the touch of another... and had no way of knowing the sex of that other... would there be a sexual response? I think there would be. I really do. Others, of course, will feel differently.
Oh yeah... the question: "GAY FOR PAY". I find it offensive. It implies that money is the only defining factor, and that gay is dirty and must be purchased. Now the power trip of money may do it for some... but I am guessing that there are probably some other benefits!
Sorry if I was offensive. Just another perspective. Mine, actually.
2007-03-05 14:24:12 · answer #2 · answered by Mikisew 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I do believe in the Kinsey Scale. Depends how do you define Gay? Is a guy gay if he recognizes other guys as more sexually attractive then himself? Or in order for a guy to be gay does he have to have a boyfriend, want to marry another guy and have feelings for him.
A lot of guys who can't get sex, I think might sleep with another guy just for sex even though they are not attracted to the same sex. Is that guy gay? Or is he just a horny guy that can't find any women to sleep with so he pulls a last resort?
Many married straight guys, I would bet, though many wouldn't admit it , have had some type of sexual interaction with another guy and they only keep it to themselves. Maybe it was just an experimental kiss, or maybe they actually slept with a guy. They aren't gay, they just had to try it once in their lives.
2007-03-05 12:30:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
LOL at each and all of the persons who say "guy hates homosexuality" IF humankind fairly did, do no longer you think of there could be plenty much less of it? however the component is that God hates the sinner, n ot the sin. that's human beings who bypass the line and hate the sinner FOR The sin.
2016-10-02 10:59:04 · answer #4 · answered by henshaw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In terms of the porn stars, it is kind of hot to see "straight" stars get it on with a guy.
2007-03-05 15:28:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, that's pretty crazy. I wouldn't sleep with another guy even for a million dollars. I can't believe straight guys would actually do that for money...they're probably bi or just gay.
2007-03-05 12:22:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Hey It's all friction...and as long as both parties are getting what they want who cares...not black and white to me...not much of the world is
2007-03-05 12:40:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i don't know, there are a lot a gay guys pretending to be straight (hey there ted haggart) so, i smell double standard on your part. if gay guys pretend to be straight, why can't straight guys pretend to be gay? and hey if you can get paid for it, more power to you!
2007-03-05 12:32:24 · answer #8 · answered by puzzlite 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
John Wayne voice - "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do".
2007-03-05 13:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by Just Ask Ashley 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i tihnk its kinda sick..i saw some documentary on the porn industry and they have straight men doing that. i think its kinda desperate... and some of these men have wives.. i couldn't be with a guy who sleeps with men. thats gross.
2007-03-05 12:23:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋