English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-05 10:57:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

19 answers

NOT! Circumcision is nasty. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6584757516627632617&q=circumcision&hl=en

T

2007-03-06 08:10:05 · answer #1 · answered by calngavinsmom 2 · 1 3

Circumcise

2007-03-05 19:00:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Circumcise.

2007-03-05 19:00:17 · answer #3 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 4 0

Circumcise!

And it doesn't look anything like that, check out:

www.circumcisionvancouver.com

2007-03-07 11:46:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

i hope you are talking about a baby here! circumcise because it just gets in the way later.

2007-03-12 18:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by kaleo 3 · 1 0

circumcise

2007-03-05 19:01:03 · answer #6 · answered by noodles 3 · 3 0

Circumcise! You are prone to get infections if you don't.

2007-03-12 17:35:21 · answer #7 · answered by anpwhited 2 · 1 0

Circumcise-you want to get laid in the future, don't you?

2007-03-05 19:14:28 · answer #8 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 3 0

circumcision is safer when dealing with a zipper and cleaner.

2007-03-13 03:58:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

circumcise its cleaner

2007-03-13 14:50:17 · answer #10 · answered by shorty 3 · 0 0

I would say no, it is horrific... and it does not highten the risk of cancer if a man is not circumcised.

2007-03-12 19:56:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers