English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Manmade Origin Of AIDS
By Paris and Dr. Kwame Nantambu

Yes, you read it correctly. AIDS is manmade. Here you will read, explicitly, that the US government funded the creation of this virus that would "lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations" and "be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease." Yes, there is most definitely a war going on, and it is much scarier than you probably ever imagined. Read on:

The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 through funds obtained by the United States Defense Department via House Bill 15090. The Bill, which called for the US Defense Department to receive $10 million dollars to research, test and develop the virus, was reviewed in Hearings before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for 1970. Copies of the full text of the Bill are not available in any public library and are impossible to locate online, although many other Bills are.
Part Five of H.R. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering.

The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974 - 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The World Health Organization (WHO) started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white male homosexuals were injected with laced Hepatitis B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control and the New York Blood Center. The development of the virus apparently had a dual purpose: (1) As a political/ethnic weapon to be used against black individuals and (2) one of the programmed efforts at de-population.


For the record it must be stated emphatically that the origin of AIDS has absolutely nothing to do with the green monkey, African people nor the Haitians.
The stark reality is that, according to The Strecker Memorandum (1983):
-AIDS is a man-made disease
-AIDS is not a homosexual disease
-AIDS is not a venereal disease
-AIDS can be carried by mosquitoes
-Condoms will reduce the chances of, but not prevent AIDS
-There are at least six different AIDS viruses in the world 1
AIDS represents the most potent medical weapon in the armory of Europeans to annihilate, decimate and castrate African, Hispanic and Asian peoples under the rubric of European supremacy.

Why and How was AIDS Created?
The AIDS virus was created 'as a political/ethnic weapon to be used mainly against Blacks.

2 "AIDS is biological warfare at its Euro-supremacist zenith," according to Malcolm Turner in his book AIDS is Biological Warfare: A Warning to African People. "AIDS is not an act of God against homosexuals; it did not appear out of thin air and it did not come from Africa. It was designed to kill people of color and a review of the statistics show that this is exactly what is happening...it is the creation of a sick, demented white racist power structure...

3 The creation and subsequent deployment of the AIDS virus by the World Health Organization was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got out of hand. It was a cold-blood successful attempt to create a killer virus which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa.

4 The creation of AIDS "was not an accident?. It was deliberate.

5 AIDS is nothing less than genocide by white racists against the rest of humanity.

6 The Real Origin of AIDS
The AIDS virus was created by the United States government at Fort Dietrich in Maryland, a biological warfare laboratory in building number A550 in the P4 lab. The sum of US $10m was requested by the Defense Department to build the lab under the House of Representatives Bill number H.R. 15090 in the 91st Congress in 1970.

7 Dr. Theodore Strecker writes, "The US National Cancer institute, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, manufactured the AIDS virus in their laboratories at Fort Detrich, Maryland. They combined two deadly retroviruses, the Bovine Leukemia Virus and the Visna Virus, and injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the first human retrovirus known to man and now believed to be 100 percent fatal to those infected.

8 Dr. Strecker further contends that AIDS couldn't have engineered itself, and reiterates that it was produced in a laboratory by virologists. "The World Health Organization (WHO) called for scientists to work with these deadly agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. An attempt was made to see if viruses could in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility was looked into that the immune response to the virus itself would be impaired if the infecting virus damaged, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus?

9 The AIDS epidemic was triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox.

10 In fact, the WHO itself has studied "new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia, awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defense virus infection (HIV).

11 Pearce Wright, an advisor to the WHO, writes, "I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of AIDS?.

12 The fact of the matter is that the WHO concluded that "in the relation to the immune response, a number of useful experimental approaches can be visualized?.

13 As a result, "they suggested that a way to do this would be to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back and observe the results.

14 The WHO used smallpox vaccine as their vicious vehicle to spread the AIDS virus and the geographic areas chosen were Uganda and other African countries, Haiti, Brazil and Japan. The present "AIDS epidemic coincides with these geographical areas.

15 As an addendum, "there is also substantial evidence" to show that a confidential source in the WHO has revealed that there is "a strong correlation between the proportion of people in different central African countries who consented to the smallpox vaccine program and the proportion of those now infected with AIDS.

16 The stark reality is that "the AIDS virus must be a man-made, bio-engineered virus.

17 Hence, it's no great surprise that the WHO, in true Euro-supremacist modus operandi, "started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over 100 million Africans (as part of its global non-European population reduction program) in 1977.

18 Dr. Theodore A. Strecker further writes, "If the African green monkey could transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa makes it statistically impossible for a single episode, such as a monkey biting someone, to have brought this epidemic to this point. The doubling time of the number of people infected, about every 14 months, when correlated with the first known case, and the present known number of cases, prove beyond a doubt that a large number of people had to have been infected at the same time. Starting in 1972 with the first case from our mythical monkey and doubling the number infected from that single source every 14 months you get only a few thousand cases. From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years or 180 months. If it takes 14 months to double the number of cases, then there would have been 13 doublings, 1 then 2, then 4, then 8, etc. In 15 years, from a single source of infection there would be about 8,000 cases in Africa, not 75 million AIDS infected people. We are approaching World War II mortality statistics here without a shot being fired.

19 The fact of the matter is that under the current European global policy of annihilating people of color, "AIDS is expected to kill more people and orphan more children than all the wars of the 20th century combined.

20 The Global Impact of AIDS
The spread of the AIDS virus is omnipresent among African peoples and people of color. AIDS is without any doubt, the largest epidemic in human history. The global magnitude of the impact of AIDS is such that as of June 2001, "more than 70 percent of the people with the virus that causes AIDS are in sub-Saharan Africa, the poorest region in the world.

21 AIDS has transformed Africa into a "killing field.

22 In fifteen years, "AIDS has killed 11 million Africans, more than 80 percent of the world's AIDS deaths.

23 AIDS "has struck some 36 million people, 25.3 million of them in Africa, and orphaned 13 million children.

24 According to the United Nations in 1998, there are 5,500 AIDS-related funerals every day in Africa.

25 In Zimbabwe alone, 1,200 die each week from AIDS. As of February 2001, there are 5.8 million AIDS cases in South/Southeast Asia, 1.4 million in Latin America, and 640,000 in East Asia. In fact, in June 1991, it was reported that "by the end of this decade, Asia will be the epicenter of the worldwide AIDS epidemic, host to the fastest-growing AIDS population in the world.

26 As of February 2000, the Caribbean has as high as 700,000 people infected with AIDS, thus making the region "the second largest incidence in the world after Africa.

27 In the case of the United States, African-Americans account for about 11 percent of the national population but 57 percent of the AIDS cases. In 1999, African-Americans and Hispanics accounted for almost 70 percent of new HIV infections. However, strangely enough, death rates in Europe of people infected with the virus that causes AIDS have fallen 84 percent since 1985.

28 The reality is that two-thirds of the people in the world infected with AIDS today are in sub-Saharan Africa, but only about 2 percent are in Western Europe. That is no accident. It is genocide. The sole purpose of this heinous man-made virus is to reduce the global population of African peoples and people of color through AIDS decimation, annihilation and castration, by any and all means necessary. AIDS represents a medical intifadah declared against African people and people of color.
The Tuskegee Experiment

A relevant comparison analysis is the Tuskegee Experiment that was conducted by the U.S. government on innocent and unsuspecting African-American males from 1932-1972. In 1932, the United States Public Health Services solicited and recruited about 400 African-American males as guinea pigs in "one of the most notorious medical experiments ever" on the study of the effects of syphilis in Macon County, Alabama.

29 These subjects never gave informed consent for their participation in the study. "The Black men were never told they had syphilis nor were they told their disease could endanger their families.

30 In the fall of 1932, handbills were posted and circulated at several church gatherings in the poor county, where even the one black doctor served only those who could afford to pay. The ads promised "special treatment" for men with "bad blood," which, to local folks, could mean anything from VD to anemia to indigestion. Eager to take advantage of any kind of medical care that was free, men signed up in droves.

Sadly, even when a penicillin treatment cure for syphilis became available in the 1940s, the men in the Tuskegee syphilis experiment "were not allowed to receive the antibiotic.

31 By U.S. government decree "other doctors in Macon County were forbidden to treat any of the men in the study.

32 These Black men were sharecroppers with no formal education. "Many had never seen a doctor, much less been treated by one. Anything white people asked them to do, they did.

33 The U.S. has stated that "the purpose of the study was to record the destructive effects of untreated syphilis and to follow closely the medical progress of the group until each man died.

34 However, according to Martin P. Levine, the experiment was easily justified by physicians and scientists because "it was widely believed that Black racial inferiority made them a notoriously syphilis-soaked race.

35 These physicians and scientists were convinced that: "(The) smaller brains (of these Black men) lacked mechanisms for controlling sexual desire, causing them to be highly promiscuous. They matured early and consequently were more sexually active, and the Black man's enormous penis with its long foreskin was prone to venereal infections. These physiological differences meant that disease must affect the races differently.

36
Conclusion

In sum, the U.S. government-sponsored Tuskegee Experiment is germ-biological warfare committed on its own citizens for 40 years. It must be noted, however, that in 1974, a US Civil Rights attorney won a $10m settlement from the government for the Tuskegee victims and their heirs, and another $2.1m payment was received in 1976. On May 16, 1997, then-President Bill Clinton issued an official public apology on behalf of the U.S. government to the victims of the Tuskegee experiment.

37 So you see, the notion of waging biological warfare on so-called undesirable populations is not a foreign one to the US Government. This is it's legacy - the greatest homicidal and genocidal killing machine in the history of civilization.

AS POSTED BY DAMON.


Each one reach and teach one........NATION

2007-03-05 09:45:50 · 7 answers · asked by Natasha 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

note to all :- I HAVE NOT MADE UP MY MIND!
I just read this and was like wut the hell, where did this come from. I don't know what to think but honestly you really can't put nyfin past politics can you?

Lol to the American Haters comment. :')

2007-03-05 10:00:04 · update #1

7 answers

I'm not sure if it's true, but it sure sounds logical...

I find it absolutely ridiculous that after primates have roamed the Earth for more than 5 million years & modern humans for over 500 thousand years without incidence, it is a coincidence that they have contracted this indestructible virus in the 20th Century when & where the technology existed to enable the creation of such viruses.

Then again, this could very well be just another case of natural immunity & susceptibility.

Look at the American Indians, whom where mostly annihilated not by war but by famine & diseases brought by the first European settlers in the 15th & 16th centuries.

2007-03-05 16:21:27 · answer #1 · answered by Genius G 2 · 3 2

Not true. It's just another conspiracy theory that's been around for awhile. Don't know the origins but, whoever came up with it didn't know a lot about Aids. If the government engineered it they wasted a lot of money because there are a lot more effective ways to do what the theory suggest they were trying to do, anthrax, smallpox, Ebola, and in undeveloped countries plague just to name a few.
The first problem with the theory is the infection rate, Any government designed virus will have a 100% infection rate on contact. Aids/HIV has a low infection rate. About a 1 in 100 chance of acquiring the virus with unprotected sex (penile penetration of the vagina). That alone pretty much debunks this particular theory.

2007-03-05 10:09:04 · answer #2 · answered by doobie 4 · 5 4

I'd hate to say this, especially because I don't even know you, but you're WRONG!!!. First of all, HIV virus can be found as far back as 1939 in an African person. It was also found in 1969 in a teenager in Missouri and in 1976 in a Norwegian Sailor. So, it was around before 1969. Second, smallpox was eradicted in 1980, shortly before we discovered HIV. Andm we first started to rid the world of smallpox in 1967, shortly before this bill came into place. Third, you have to realize, it may not have been a monkey bite that caused SIV to jump to HIV in humans. The monkey could have been bushmeat. If the avian flu can jump from birds to humans, then SIV can jump too. And, there aren't six different kinds of AIDS. There are two kinds of HIV. HIV-1, which is present almost everywhere. And HIV-II, which is only found along the ivory coast of Africa. There are 16 different clades of HIV-1, which means that these clades operate slightly different from eachother. As for Japan being a country that has HIV, there are only .1% of the population living with HIV. And, if this was really a germ warfare, don't you think that they would have realized this would spread to others, especially the US? And, since when does a germ warfare product affect you by having sex? It doesn't and it never has and it never will. If you dropped a nuclear bomb on a city and some people survived, their blood would not be affected, their dna might, but not their blood. As for the Tuskeegee Project, it's a shame that happened. But, if this was a disease meant to destroy black people, then why are they only being affected now? In the US, white gay men still have the highest numbers. Although, in their defense, the numbers are dropping. So, don't believe everything you read. And, by only believing one thing you are causing the spread of HIV. So, knock it off.

2007-03-06 03:20:00 · answer #3 · answered by nicoleblingy2003 4 · 7 6

No, it orginated in African primates and then jumped to humans, and then spread.

Africa is particularly hard hit because it is where the virus originated, because of the lack of knowledge and education about how the virus is transmitted, and because of the poor to non-existent health care system that is in many places in Africa. In addition, cultural sexual practices in many groups and the reluctance to use condoms, contribute to the spread of the disease. (This is true in many places in the world, not just Africa.)

It is true that in the United States, the medical establishment has practiced unethical, immoral, and inhumane experiments on poor blacks. (For example, pretending to treat poor black men who were infected with syphilis but instead just studying them to find out how the disease progressed.) I believe that these practices have contributed to the mistrust of some poor and some ethnic minorities towards the medical establishment and makes conspiracies like this sound more plausible.

What you cite makes a lot of claims, but doesn't provide any evidence or proof. And these conspiracy claims are very detrimental because the World Health Organization is trying to eradicate some very deadly diseases through vaccinations. What if someone were to believe these kooks and then refuses to have their child vaccinated for polio or some other disease?

This is from wikipedia....

Origin of HIV
Main article: AIDS origin
AIDS was first reported June 5, 1981, when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recorded a cluster of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (now classified as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia) in five homosexual men in Los Angeles.[125] Health authorities soon realized that nearly half of the people identified with the syndrome were not homosexual men.

Three of the earliest known instances of HIV infection are as follows:

A plasma sample taken in 1959 from an adult male living in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[126]
HIV found in tissue samples from a 15 year old African-American teenager who died in St. Louis in 1969.[127]
HIV found in tissue samples from a Norwegian sailor who died around 1976.[128]
Two species of HIV infect humans: HIV-1 and HIV-2. HIV-1 is more virulent and more easily transmitted. HIV-1 is the source of the majority of HIV infections throughout the world, while HIV-2 is not as easily transmitted and is largely confined to West Africa.[129] Both HIV-1 and HIV-2 are of primate origin. The origin of HIV-1 is the Central Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) found in southern Cameroon.[130] It is established that HIV-2 originated from the Sooty Mangabey (Cercocebus atys), an Old World monkey of Guinea Bissau, Gabon, and Cameroon.

Most experts believe that HIV probably transferred to humans as a result of direct contact with primates, for instance during hunting or butchery.[131] A more controversial theory known as the OPV AIDS hypothesis suggests that the AIDS epidemic was inadvertently started in the late 1950s in the Belgian Congo by Hilary Koprowski's research into a polio vaccine.[132][133] According to scientific consensus, this scenario is not supported by the available evidence.[134][135][136]

2007-03-05 10:06:26 · answer #4 · answered by meridocbrandybuck 4 · 8 5

No. But you have already made up your mind.
It came from monkeys to people (who ate their brains) and a homo sexual promiscuous Canadian flight attendant was patient one around 1979-1980, and infected a whole bunch of men, who then spread the wealth.
There was one case of a seaman in 1969 who died under mysterious circumstances, and when they checked the preserved remains about 1982, they found that he had had AIDS back then and died from it.

2007-03-05 09:50:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 8

aids happened from people having sex with animals, it then spread into the gay community, and extended from there.

don't believe crap you read on the internet, alot of it is not true and one sided.

2007-03-05 09:53:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 15

ALL CONSPIRACY CRAP BY AMERICAN HATERS.

2007-03-05 09:50:14 · answer #7 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 6 14

fedest.com, questions and answers