2007-03-05 08:14:04 · 11 answers · asked by DEADMAN TAKER 4LIFE 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
WWE has way better story lines, I watched TNA two weeks ago and the story wasn't that great. TNA has a lot more action, however. They do have some good names, Sting, Christian Cage, and Rhyno. WWE is a lot more popular though.
2007-03-05 08:30:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tna is Innovative, exciting and chalk full of great stars such as:
Kevin Nash
Sting (One of the Greatest)
The New Age Outlaws
The Big Bad Booty Daddy Scott Steiner
Kurt Angle
AJ Styles (Despite my disdain)
And countless others.
Think of TNA as an ECW / WCW half-breed. It's entertaining at least, but they are flawed. They cram too much. It seems like they try to put just to much into the show and it's overdone.
Total: 7.5 out of 10 stars
WWE on the other hand has changed it would seem for the new age right? Wrong! It's still the same old WWF that I used to watch growing up. The only thing that EVER changes anymore is the faces. The day the WWE shocks me again is the day I see Bret Hart walk up a WWE ramp. Overall though, not taking away or giving anything to TNA for WWE being the "Richer, and more apt financially".
Total: 6 out of 10 stars
2007-03-05 16:30:46 · answer #2 · answered by jamescaine66 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who has more famous wrestlers has got to be the stupidest answer I have ever heard. It depends on what you like. WWE is more about entertainment and story lines no matter how bad they are sometimes. TNA is about wrestling. It's a throw back to the days of old. They have a lot of younger talent where as WWE is really relying on guys in their late 30's to early 40's to keep he ship afloat. So I say TNA right now but everything is subject to change.
2007-03-05 16:28:42 · answer #3 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better because it had better storylines then TNA.I would say that TNA is better at the moment because of the crappy storylines they are doing in wwe now but overall WWE is better then TNA.
2007-03-05 16:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by timothy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE/ECW is better, because TNA can't think of anything on their own, they have to copy off of WWE/ECW most of the time. Plus, WWE/ECW has my favorite superstars/extremists: John Cena, DX, The Hardys, Bobby Lashley, CM Punk, RVD, Kane, Taker, and London & Kendrick. And also, I think WWE has more and better looking Divas than TNA.
2007-03-05 16:57:34 · answer #5 · answered by cheezllord81 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wwe has better story lines but tna has better younger talent
2007-03-05 16:18:11 · answer #6 · answered by sully 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heavyweights - WWE
Cruiserweights/X Division - TNA
Right Now - WWE
10 Years from now - TNA
WWE has a lot of aging stars for example
Booker T - 42
Triple H - 38
HBK - 42
Undertaker - 45
Batista - 38
Finlay - 49
TNA has youth on their side
Samoa Joe - 28
Petey Williams - 25
Chris Sabin, Sonjay Dutt - 24
Jay Lethal - 21
AJ Styles - 30
Abyss - 35
2007-03-05 16:33:28 · answer #7 · answered by Not You 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE i think becuz it has more good wrestlers and all the fans from all over the world love wwe and means more money there more popular i love WWE
2007-03-05 16:49:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE, it has The Boogeyman
2007-03-05 16:17:58 · answer #9 · answered by Rain. 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why isnt wrestling society x in this and i think it depenends on wat you like but i say i like both but ill give wwe an extra point
2007-03-05 19:45:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋