This is the first question for my assignment which is titled: critical analysis and summary.
I have to complete a critical analysis of the following document:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,5500,1126303,00.html
The first question says:
Identify the main line of reasoning of the piece - what is the writer's argument?
Don't mean to sound dumb but this is confusing me and really peeing me off.
Do i just need to say whether the writers is for or against IQ testing? If that is the case, i have read over the document, yet i can't work out whether the writer is for or against it?
Please Help
2007-03-05 08:11:04 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
The author is against iq testing that is based on eugenics or race. She is for scholastic testing which rates how well a person is doing in school rather than anything based on base intelligence.
2007-03-05 08:18:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, what they mean to ask is this:
What is this article really about, and is the writer pro or con, and HOW? If I'm not mistaken, it's the HOW you are after.
2007-03-05 08:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by netthiefx 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋