In Beckham's prime, this question is much more difficult then today.
Today, no question, Henry is the more effective footballer.
But, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Beckham was the best right sided midfielder in the game.
2007-03-05 08:02:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wittmann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
David Beckham
2007-03-05 15:54:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ra88ie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thierry Henry
2007-03-05 16:38:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jack Joffre 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really comparable really, Thierry Henry is a striker, Beckham a midfielder. They both have different roles to play for the teams they play with
2007-03-05 15:56:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alistair B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
thiery henry is way better player than david beckham
2007-03-05 17:02:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by saidd 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thierry Henry.
2007-03-06 09:07:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by foongwk140804 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thiery is a far better more skillful player, but he dosent half want everthing his own way. Beckam is more professional but thats probably just his buisness mind coming into play so he can get more advertising.
2007-03-06 06:08:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by SJ 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
thiery henry
david beckham is the most overrated footballer.
he's just an average player with a name. wanker!
2007-03-05 15:57:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by sassbs2740 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although they don't have the same qualities I have to say Thierry Henry as he's contributed and won more for both Arsenal and the national team than Beckam did.
Thanx!
2007-03-06 02:17:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Invasion 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Beckham could't lace Thierry Henry's boots.
2007-03-05 16:19:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by AYRSHIREBHOY 1
·
2⤊
1⤋