English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I currently use an Intel Pentium IV 2.4 Ghz 32-bit procesoor.I am going to buy a new 64-bit processor.Should i install the MicroSoft Windows XP Professional 32 bit or the MicroSoft Windows XP Professional 64 bit.Whats the difference?Is changing the OS to a 64-bit one necessary?Will the processor be able to perform in its maximum capacity OR the 32-bit OS will make the processor slower?I am confused.Please dont tell me to install Vista.I totally hate it.

2007-03-05 07:48:43 · 5 answers · asked by biker boy 1 in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

5 answers

Yes, get Windows XP Pro 64. But why don't you wait a bit longer, and get one of the flavors of Windows Vista Premium. Get this on an awesome right with 2GB of RAM and lots of disk space. Get the most awesome graphics card.

But do this after you read raving reviews and positive editorial comments from published Experts about improved security. If you are in a hurry now, you wil pay more later. So wait and Save.

Large corporations that use servers and shared software, with websites that are used as a part of their production methods will only update to Window Vista after everything that they use has CHECKED OUT. Review every piece of hardware and software that you use BEFORE you decide to upgrade. Do not assume that things will work.

Good luck and Happy Computing!

2007-03-05 07:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can run 32bit XP on your computer or 64bit.

The 64bit version of XP could bring along issues with drivers. You should check the manufacturer's website for each hardware component you have to see if they offer 64bit drivers for it. That is the only issue I've personally had with running 64bit XP. You can run 32bit software on 64bit XP but it runs on a subsystem that 'can' degrade performance. Just about every application you use will be 32bit still. The majority of the applications that have 64bit versions are math processing, large data handling, or graphically intensive applications. So chances are, the 32bit version of the OS is your best bet.

2007-03-05 07:58:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The only problem you might have with a 64bit Operating system is driver support. There are still several peripheral manufacturers that are unwilling to support all of their hardware in 64bit Windows. That support is even worse for Linux.

Windows XP 32bit works great and you still do see a performance increase. I would stick with that.

2007-03-05 07:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by phoenix_61_98 3 · 0 0

You should install the 64 bit OS for the 64 bit processor.

There'll be a huge performance gain (as the OS will be optimized for the processor), and you will be able to access a larger amount of RAM.

2007-03-05 07:54:48 · answer #4 · answered by Vegan 7 · 0 0

maximum sixty 4-bit processors (incl. all computer processor, like AMD Phenom) do no longer desire a sixty 4-bit OS, as they have outfitted-in backwards compatibility with 32-bit. because it truly is amazingly not likely that you're nonetheless operating a 16-bit operating equipment (extremely, living house windows 3.a million and older), you're reliable to flow. it truly is any opposite direction round which couldn't artwork, because 32-bit processors of route do no longer help sixty 4-bit application.

2016-12-05 06:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers