A symphony orchestra is a group of musicians (orchestra) that play symphonies. Wouldn't a philharmonic orchestra be an orchestra that plays philharmonics? Sounds reasonable to me... except for the small problem that there is no such thing as a philharmonic.
The first use of 'philharmonic' was in London in 1813. An organisation was founded called the Philharmonic Society. The word 'philharmonic' translates to 'music lover'. The sources I've found say this was taken from the French 'philharmonoque', but I think it is more likely that the word was taken right from the Greek. Greek is much more fashionable than French - especially if you're living in London in 1813*.
Anyway, the first Philharmonic Orchestra was established in London in 1895. The current London Philharmonic was established in 1932, the London Symphony was established in 1940. My guess is, whoever got to the name they wanted first - won. (This avoids having names like "The Other London Symphony Orchestra".)
I'm sure if you asked a member of the LSO or the LPO, they could tell you all sorts of jokes on how to distinguish a philharmonic from a symphony orchestra. But in practical application, there really is no difference. They both love music, and they both play symphonies.
2007-03-05 07:05:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by murphs 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is no distinction, in simple terms distinctive names for a complete length orchestra. The “huge 5” American orchestras names are: Boston Symphony Orchestra Chicago Symphony Orchestra The Cleveland Orchestra long island Philharmonic The Philadelphia Orchestra
2016-10-02 10:34:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by trapani 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know the answer but thats a dam good question!
2007-03-05 07:03:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by tom2day 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing, there both ****!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-05 06:58:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by chuckydoll 2
·
0⤊
1⤋