im afraid you only get to hear about solved crime.not the 90% that get away with it.as the chief said,crime pays.the government have got away with it for decades.
2007-03-05 06:26:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by earl 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The way to deal with crime is far more simple than people realise. For some reason many politicians think they have the answer, such as short sharp shock treatment of the offender. Mass arrests by the police etc. None of these methods works in the long run.
The way to combat crime in society is to teach children from day one at their very first school all about citizenship and the responsibilities which go with it.
I am always amazed how so many people think that important subjects cannot be taught to a group of five year olds. Well they can.
Let me explain it to you thus. A couple of year ago, I was working at the London HQ of the Mori Poll and while there picked up one of their pamphlets. This pamphlet dealt with a survey which Mori had conducted amongst a large group of children in the age group 5 - 7. To everyone's surprise at Mori, what they discovered is that all of these children, certainly by the time they have reached age 7, had already formed their life-time political and religeous beliefs.
Preaching to the confirmed is not going to make them change.
The classical Greeks understood this and invented a new Greek word - CHARACTER. This word is used to described what happens to a child's mind from the moment it is born to within a year or less of the onset of pubity and the beginning of the approach to adulthood.
A human being is formed in the brain by the time they are seven and not much later and nothing can be done to change that person or reform them.
EDIT: The late President LBJ - USA, introduced a program into the US eduction system which enabled children to start school at least one year earlier than was usual. Think this was called 'right start' or some such. A recent survey of these former pupils, now grown up, married etc., found that none of them had ever offended or commited any crime. Astonishing but true.
Lady Bird described her husband in an interview with the BBC as a 'socialist'. He certainly was she said, but don't tell him that.
2007-03-05 06:37:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
What I've noticed about young people in trouble is that they were bored. Either they were not sufficiently stimulated at school, or nobody at home was taking much interest in them. Nearly all of them seem to come from broken homes. So doesn't part of the answer lie with the generation responsible for bringing them into the world and then bringing them up? I've come to the conclusion that at rock bottom what keeps most of us on the straight and narrow is the thought that our parents would be very disappointed in us if we behaved in a certain way. Not that most youngsters would want to express it like that, but nevertheless they are looking to their parents for interest and appreciation. And when that's not forthcoming, they can often go astray.
2007-03-05 06:29:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Doethineb 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
EFFECTIVE DETERRENT. Simple words, but not so simple in practise. In the United Kingdom we are becoming too politically correct and bow to too many human rights.(probably due to too many quangos where people are trying to justify their huge wages, so come up with "what we should do is...")
I am not over religious, but we have a perfect set of rules in the ten commandments. If they are broken,then punish accordingly.
Could we take a guideline from what happened to a friend when visiting Saudi Arabia. She dropped her purse. Several people stopped her and pointed to the purse,but would not touch it themselves.....Could this be in any way due to the fact that they faced having a hand chopped off????
2007-03-11 09:21:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Regardless of whether the cops catch the "Bad Guys" or not, crime is always going to occur. It has occured since the bible, lies and decite, stealing and all...No one lives by the commandments like they should... Regardless of the crime or what the nature of the crime may be, it is never going to stop, someone somewhere is going to mess up and do something that they aren't suppose to do....
2007-03-12 19:16:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by August S 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Alot of crime happens due to the problems in society ie poverty, abuse, domestic violence, drug use, homelessness. If these issues can be dealt with, then maybe alot of the crime could be prevented. Some how I don't think it will happen any time soon..
2007-03-05 06:17:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Danru 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
best way to prevent a crime is not to give any thief the opportunity to steal. as for burglars. if civilians were empowered to protect themselves at all costs if they found an intruder in their house then i don't think burglars would risk getting killed for a television.
2007-03-05 09:36:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
"Rehabilitation" is a slippery term. i do no longer disagree with you in spirit, yet i assume it would be counted on the character of the rehabilitation being proposed. to illustrate, assume I certainly have a sociopath whose in basic terms criminal pastime is stealing candy bars. If i will no longer be able to rehabilitate the candy bar thief, what do I do with him? that's a petty objection at this point, yet what a pair of very extreme crime that, although, we often do no longer affiliate with long penitentiary words, like your ordinary battery case? could desire to sociopaths spend longer words in penitentiary for battery than somewhat rehabilitated human beings? What if i may be rehabilitated in a month? I recommend somewhat, somewhat, demonstrably rehabilitated? What if i stumble on the thank you to rehabilitate 9 out of ten rapists in a month? could desire to 9 out of ten rapists get one month in penitentiary, and the 10th rapist get fifteen years? in basic terms some issues to think of approximately. I style of style the classic codes of justice that demanded compensation in style for many petty crimes - thieve a television, pay or artwork the equivalent of what you stole back on your sufferer. the rest, I agree, could desire to be addressed from a rehabilitative attitude, yet i think of we could desire to consistently be careful, and be honest adequate to renowned that component of justice is having a punitive or remunerative functionality. In different words, no longer in basic terms letting a rehabilitated rapist get out after a 12 months, or enable a sociopathic candy bar thief languish in penitentiary. And the justice device is classist and racist as hell. i do no longer recognize the thank you to restoration the device. I wish I did. one factor shall we do is concentration on penitentiary reform so as that as quickly as the justice device does screw human beings over, they gained't could desire to bypass to a place the place they would be raped, stabbed, or given inadequate well being care (human beings on loss of existence row have misplaced feet to untreated diabetes). yet another factor we are able to do is decriminalize petty offenses like drug use. yet yeah, there must be some expertise-elevating and public rigidity on the criminal device approximately race and sophistication disparities in "justice."
2016-12-18 15:50:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
chop , chop , chop .... after two chops most people will not be able to leave their own home , let alone committing crime.
2007-03-13 05:07:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
crime is always exist but the criminal need to panish in everytime.
2007-03-05 06:25:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Difi 4
·
0⤊
2⤋