have big things or are over-compensating for lack of?
2007-03-05 06:01:09 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
oh come on poppa we know you're big!
where's your pimp look?
2007-03-05 06:07:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
even as no longer completely ideas-blowing, that is an extrapolation of more suitable social developments, he ignores the possibility of reversal -- favoring the unique. He ignores the state-of-the-artwork factors which could impression reproductive success. there is a tendency in route of uniformity in body structure determined by technique of the dimensions of someone likely to live to inform the tale a vehicle crash, as an party. a classification depending branch into species calls for an isolation mechanism. A gene that subdivides the inhabitants gained't inevitably construct a classification branch. Social and geographic mechanisms are not likely. An underclass, could be more suitable likely to carry genetic variety. finally, issues come into concentration even as our ability to furnish food can't strengthen and our inhabitants taxes that food furnish. Malthusian regulation takes carry and we are again on the ideas that inspired Darwin.
2016-12-05 06:49:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually it is given to someone who is a Jr. The rest of the time it is a name that someone else gave them, so in those case they wouldn't be over-compensating for anything.
2007-03-05 06:04:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't have big in my name and I have been over-compensated naturally.
2007-03-05 12:58:50 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. D. AKA Evil Woman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Over compensating!!!!
2007-03-05 06:03:34 · answer #5 · answered by Jennifer P 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I was going to use big in my name but Big Tantello sounds like a Italian Restaurant
2007-03-05 06:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Rocky The Fearless 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lol... Compensating for sure.
2007-03-05 06:06:30 · answer #7 · answered by It's just me! 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think they are over-compensating for lack of ...except for you! lol
2007-03-05 06:05:45 · answer #8 · answered by Terry King 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i say lack...
since they aren't big in any way
(like being a bigger person in situations, in the pants department, and in society)
They feel power in being called that
or
this makes up for what they lack!
2007-03-05 06:07:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
over-compensating
2007-03-05 06:04:35 · answer #10 · answered by kittymimm 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know... there are plenty of bald guys named Curly, so I imagine the Big guys have nothing going on anywhere.
2007-03-05 06:05:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋