It is clever because it has two meanings. I also really believe.
2007-03-05 05:20:23 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wow, a lot of people seem to care about grammatical issues than meaning. We are in sad state.
2007-03-05 05:29:58 · update #1
I am not easily coerced, nor do I have strings attached to my limbs. I will keep in mind how easily corrupted people in power become.
2007-03-05 07:31:10 · update #2
sounds good but alas i dont dont vote
2007-03-05 05:23:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds good -- it's short enough that people will remember it, and vague enough that you can construe it to mean just about anything you want. Of course, once you are voted into office, your constituents will do that construing for you in order to force you into giving them anything THEY want... Hmm. My advice would be to not run for office at all. It's much safer and does very little to degrade your character.
2007-03-05 15:21:55 · answer #2 · answered by Richard S 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It isn't grammatical to have two meanings (it needs an article). Sorry, but I don't like it.
2007-03-05 13:24:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pretty good.
Don't forget to add something about being for "working families"
Apparently it is crucial that a politician be for "working families"
Kinda like being for "nice" because "nice" is good.
2007-03-05 13:24:16 · answer #4 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope, it doesn't do anything for me... and I think it has grammatical issues.
2007-03-05 13:26:33 · answer #5 · answered by Amer-I-Can 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Stupid
2007-03-06 10:22:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋