Which (theoretical) Presidential ticket would you rather see win in 2008 and what could they accomplish?

Question

Clinton-Brownback (aka, Big Government Coalition)

Gingrich-Nader (aka, Fcuk Washington Coalition)

Answer 1

Gingrich and Nader would be a disaster, it would be two little girls fighting after school. Clinton and Brownback might work, they could just get God to fix everything.

Answer 2

Those are the craziest ticket combos I've ever heard!

While they might be possible, the VPs wouldn't have nearly the power that Cheney does. They might have to relocate the VP headquarters to California or Alaska. Or maybe they could just have a virtual office - maybe work from Starbucks twice a week and have town hall meetings with Americans instead of political party TV audiences.

Maybe if Gingrich-Nader one, their polar opposite views on government regulation yet interest in promoting the little guy and environment, they could spur real grass-roots creativity in alternative fuels research and development. Silicon Valley is always ignored by Washington DC politicians - even the California Senators. Power to the People needs to be the message out of Washington.

Brownback-Clinton would be like reality TV. Supreme Court nominations would be really interesting! Should we nominate a Supreme Court justice who wants to mandate that all US citizens, US residents and even tourists entering the USA get baptized and memorize New Testament scripture, or should we nominate a candidate to the Supreme Court who will advocate for mandatory teaching of how to safely engage in anal sex to preschool children?

Answer 3

Gingrich and Nader would never happen, that ticket is just silly.
Nader filed an ethics complaint against Gingrich, and the two are such extreme opposites that they would kill each other before they stepped into the white house lobby. .
Did you hear somewhere that they are thinking about running together?

Answer 4

the thing is...i want other options than just the prejudiced ones you offer...

i want to vote for some one who will address the inherent inner governmental malfunctions...

i want to vote for someone who is willing to attend / challenge the extravagances of government..

i want to vote for someone loyal to me as a voter..

i want to vote for someone who is determined to solve issues,rather than work a way around them..

you aren't helping much..all your satire does is cause each party to defend there ideology's...

It might be better to ask that they define themselves and there intentions once elected, than to cause them all to constantly justify and defend for support..

It assuredly would be uplifting to see a presidential campaign conducted by hopefuls who were mature , confident, respectful of one another..vs..the little immature name calling fault finding pissin contests now so common in our electoral process today.