We elect people whose last names sound good when paired with "onomics" or "nomics." For example. Reaganomics... Clintonomics... Bushonomics...
But if your last name sounds dumb when paired with onomics or nomics, then you don't have a chance.
Dukakinomics, Kerrynomics, Goreonomics...
So if my theory is right, who has the best chance in 08?
Obamanomics? (sounds catchy). Clintonomics again? Guilianinomics? (blech!) McCainonomics? (not bad).
2007-03-05 04:00:50 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL some of these portmanteaus sound like chronic diseases!
Edwardsonomics? Sounds like a CNS condition...
2007-03-05 04:05:52 · answer #1 · answered by A Box of Signs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brownbackonomics... Sounds like something you'd catch in a San Francisco bath house.
2007-03-05 05:58:38 · answer #2 · answered by Slappy McStretchNuts 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sadly your question touches upon a dirty little truth. Too many Americans base their support for a candidate at any level upon superficial things like physical appearance, charm, & speaking style.
Hey who needs substance? Jeffereson warned us we'd get the quality of leaders we deserve!!
2007-03-05 04:07:51 · answer #3 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obamanomics. Euphonius and economical
2007-03-05 04:23:06 · answer #4 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The majority of people are stupid so no matter who wins the election we end up with a stupid person leading the stupid people .
2007-03-05 04:07:23 · answer #5 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now that's funnionomics for ya. Good one.
2007-03-05 04:34:42 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great job Slappy.......still chuckling........and here I was counting on Newt to come thourgh for us.......hmmmmm....doubt if that will work!
2007-03-05 05:12:19 · answer #7 · answered by clwkcmo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about McStretchnutsonomics.... lol
2007-03-05 20:58:24 · answer #8 · answered by Lady Hazy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋