If ANN COULTER was a lib, and she called someone on the right a
F A G, would they be yelling, screaming, and crying then?
2007-03-05 03:36:25 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
More proof that the libs only want free speech for themselves.
2007-03-05 03:37:19 · update #1
Simple. If you disagree with them they hate you.
2007-03-05 03:39:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Exactly how many accounts have you gone through, again? And the whole "hating free speech" blather means nothing: just how is criticizing her words any different from her criticizing the words of the 9/11 widows? Unless you've gained the retarded assumption that she's worth more than they are or that she should have any sort of special protection based on her trash queen status. On a final note, where do you get off protecting her, when it was merely months ago that Kerry was Mr. Man on Fire? Is there really a difference in what they said, or are their worth's different based on political affiliation? Answer that, and then decide just how worth it this question is, let alone protecting a harpy like her, who's only claim to fame is spewing a shitstorm and getting someone to stand in it.
2007-03-05 03:44:58 · answer #2 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter shows her true self while spewing racial slurs, bigoted announcements, and generally putting down anyone who doesn't fit into her TINY, limited mind. Ann Coulter doesn't debate with anyone, she just loudly tells everyone what SHE thinks and doesn't allow herself to listen to anyone elses point of view.
If she is a good example of all conservative and Republicans, no wonder the United States is in such mess as far as racial tensions, religious bigotry, and down-right idiots running this country.
There is an old saying that goes, "A mind is like a parachute, it only works when open."
Let's listen for ourselves to all of the facts, candidates, issues, with an open mind, stop listening to people on either side like Coulter, and actually think and make up our OWN MINDS for once.
2007-03-05 03:46:27 · answer #3 · answered by Nepetarias 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The constitution is a document which restricts what the govt can do and doesnt apply here.
If Ann COulter produces libelous and slanderous insults, she is accountable legally for them. Free speech doesnt give you the right to say ANYTHING and get away with it. I suggest you cons take a constitutional law class and learn what your constitution means.
2007-03-05 03:43:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you know the difference between free speech and hate speech? How about free speech v. ad homonym attack?
When's the last time YOU yelled "Fire!" in a crowded movie house?
2007-03-05 03:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, I don't like Al Franken, and I'm a Democrat.
Besides, she's allowed to say it - we're allowed to respond. Don't bring up free speech, like someone prevented her from making an *** of herself. She said it, now she has to deal with the consequences. Don't play into her standard line - "They're trying to silence me." That's crap. No one is trying to silence her. But it is an exercise of MY free speech to say that what she said was politically irresponsible and morally reprehensible. And she has to deal with that.
2007-03-05 03:44:03 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the in reality loose speech they are for is what they arise with regardless of the truth that if evidence discredits it, it truly is shown incorrect on different activities and it holds no authentic, concrete evidence on their area. it truly is like chatting with a baby related to them. You tell them something and all they reply with is 'why' each and anytime and that clean stare.
2016-12-05 06:41:28 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I would. Whoever uttered that slur would no loger have a valid opinion, in my eyes.
Free speech is fine. Hate speech, while legal, should be recognized as such.
2007-03-05 03:40:08 · answer #8 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Quite the contrary
Democrats welcome others opinions
unlike republicans that can not have their own opinions
they can only mimmick the words of Rush or other neo cons
they are kicked out of the party and called haters of America if their opinion differs from the party
We've seen many examples of this when a republican steps out out lockstep
2007-03-05 03:40:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
vile is vile no matter where it comes from.. and Ann Coulter is vile.. there is no other word that describes her.. but I don't hate her ability and right to voice her opinion.. I just disagree with the message.
2007-03-05 03:39:20 · answer #10 · answered by pip 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No, the republicans would.
You can easily turn your question around to ask, 'Why do conservatives hate free speech from liberals?'
I think everyone should be upset that she used this slur, democrat or republican. It's derogatory, and offensive, and being in the public eye, she needs to keep her bigotry to herself.
2007-03-05 03:38:29 · answer #11 · answered by white.sale 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋