Is EVOLUTION a theory full of nonsense?

Answer 1

Abraham Lincoln said "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

Answer 2

evolution is a scientific theory based on facts and evolutionary evidence gathered by observing other species in the world evolve. The reason why people find it hard to believe in evolution, is that we are still living in a very primitive age of devolupment. People believe in the religious stuff because it is still a belief used to control peoples way of thought and actions. in about 100 years or so there will be more people believing in the truth of evolution, and the true meaning of how life was created.we are to primitive right now, but in the future more will see the truth.

Answer 3

To me, evolution seems to be a theory based on some solid evidence yet is still full of holes. I'm waiting for the holes to be filled in before I lean towards or away from evolution.
I tend to think that we got to this point by a combination of mathematical creation and evolution.

Answer 4

Some here would say so.

Of course, these people do not actually understand evolution, and are generally so stupid they could not be trusted to sit the right way round on a toilet. Generally they would like to feel a sense of supremacy over others on the basis of what they believe rather than what they know or can do.

Answer 5

And to my amazement, no one here has mentioned that EVOLUTION is a biochemical process and as such, DOES NOT BELONG IN THE ASTRONOMY & SPACE FORUM! If you really want answers, why not go to the Biology or Earth Sciences forum? That's where this question belongs. Evolution has nothing to do with cosmology.

Answer 6

every scientist say that evolution is correct, because it's based on solid scientific evidences.
As a scientist, if you find better, more solid and/or easy way to demonstrate another theory I'm ready to change it, but for now evolution is correct.
A theory is valid until someone find a better one, for now evolution is the best one, based on scientific proof.

Answer 7

Evolution is not based on scientific evidence, it is based on a theory devised by one man, who, if anybody would care to read his work, was actually a Creationist. Darwin himself stated that it was only a theory and not to be accepted as fact! I do believe that we evolve over time to better adapt to situations, but it doesn't mean we change species or ever did change species. I have never understood how people who say they have common sense can really believe that, just because scientists say it's fact, we were once amoeba like fish who decided one day to get ourselves out of water, grow legs, become monkeys and then become men. That to me is utter nonsense. And to start a whole new debate, the current thinking is that the world is not as old as many people believe, so the accepted evolutionary facts can not possibly be!

Answer 8

I have my doubts about how organisms improve themselves by mutation. It is a little like monkeys banging on keyboards and coming up with Shakespeare.

With mammals, we all seem to come from the same basic layout. Backbones with the exact same number of vertebrae, head, two arms, two legs, hair, mammaries, etc. Evolution has caused variation among mammals, but there are no mammals that have developed entirely new structures by mutation.

Humans may have big brains and opposable thumbs, but we can find similar structures on all mammals, even if they are not as well developed. It is like God or the Space Aliens came up with a proto-mammal and we have devolved from it. Mutation has only brought out traits that have always been present, as opposed to developing new traits.

There are simply no examples of any of the expected missing links, the halfway mammals, or proto Oak Trees - plant, animal, or insect - they just aren't there. This is not a case for creationism, just a case against the entire spectrum of Earthly life evolving up from the primordial goo through mutation and natural selection.

Answer 9

Of course not.

There is not one single, competent, sane scientist in the world who rejects the basic framework of evolution.

P.S. I second the remark of Rachel G. below that this question has no place in this section.

Then again, what can one expect from someone who apparently thinks that evolution is nonsense.

-

Answer 10

Evolution is a viable theory,it seems like it could not be anything else.