Extremely! As the bumper sticker I saw recently said, "I wasn't using my civil rights anyway!" 1st Amendment, anyone remember that??
2007-03-05 02:21:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pretty pansyass. Any private establishment can prohibit booing a performer or speaker, although it would soon get a bad reputation for its fascist-like policies.
2007-03-05 02:15:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Oxhead 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Booing is a form of expression. Anyone know the first amendment? If I am not allowed to express myself, then you can just forget it. But then again, booing is also rude, rudeness is hurtful and could ruin someone forever. I could see both sides, So we all have a choice just not to attend or leave. Yea freedom.
2007-03-05 02:19:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by knowitall 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is kinda strange..maybe they figure that the players are getting $300,000 worht of education for playing ball and don't have to sit in lectures much, they should be treated like elite students...
2007-03-05 02:21:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by metoo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pretty freaking sad, it is all part of the sport experience for the fan and the player
2007-03-05 02:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by It's been awhile 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, that is whacked. What are they gonna ask for next quiet signs to be held up when players are shooting free throws?
2007-03-05 02:21:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just saw the report. I guess they are trying to keep violence down when they should be focusing on school counselors.
2007-03-05 02:16:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Israel-1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very Pansyassy!!! @80)
2007-03-05 02:14:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dovey 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, it's ridiculous. There is honestly no such thing as freedom of speech anymore - it's official!!
2007-03-05 02:15:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rachel 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OMG no kidding, I can see in figure skating maybe, but let's get real...
2007-03-05 02:15:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋