Failure to preserve, protect and defend the
Constitution
Knowingly manipulating and withholding intelligence from Congress and the American people to justify the invasion of Iraq.
Abuse of office and of Executive Privilege
Failing to investigate or discipline administration members for their roles in misleading Congress and the American public about the Iraqi threat and the need to invade.
Failure to ensure that laws are faithfully executed.
Directing the National Security Agency
to conduct electronic surveillance of American
citizens without obtaining the legal warrants required
by law. This seemingly violates the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act.
Repeatedly and unapologetically misleading the American people and seeking to undermine the system of checks and balances
established by the Founding Founders.
2007-03-05 01:41:11 · 7 answers · asked by AZ123 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Philip, should a court decide if these crimes have been committed or is it just right-wing pundits that should make that determination?
2007-03-05 01:51:22 · update #1
SantaBud, have you seen HR1106 Resolution to Impeach?
2007-03-05 01:53:00 · update #2
Curt, which crime do you feel is more important? Lying the nation to war and attempting to undermine the Constitution or having a little fling with an intern? And what about the poorly reported Bush 41 affair? Why was that not cause for impeachment?
2007-03-05 01:56:37 · update #3
Ken, shouldn't a court be the entity that decides if crimes have been committed?
2007-03-05 02:07:27 · update #4
ThorGirl, how can the Democrats impeach Bush for crimes in which they themselves (and the corporate media) are complicit? Are we not witnessing a complete breakdown in US democracy?
2007-03-05 02:34:06 · update #5
All are crimes...........But ALL are Null and Void........
See through history.....All Presidents That were caught in the ACT(all are guilty of) were later relieved of their crimes.
POWER AND MONEY RULE!!!!!
THE PRESIDENT OWNS THESE COURTS!!!
2007-03-05 02:07:42 · answer #1 · answered by LIAR-KILLER 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right you should be disregarded.
1) all members of congress had knowledge of this information. They may have chosen not to read it.
2) Are you talking about Bill Clinton?
3) No laws were broken. Read the FISA
4) Again are you talking about the Clinton's. So many scandals investigated -- so may people found guilty and put in jail.
2007-03-05 09:57:29 · answer #2 · answered by ken 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Apparently you have access to information the members of Congress do not have. I commend you for a well written ,even if not well documented accusation/question.
I presume you are desirous of Bush being impeached so that Mr Cheney might be your new President? Or is there some other agenda you think will help ease the current diviseness in OUR country?
2007-03-05 09:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Dear Brian if Anyone was guilty or even suspect the Demon Crats would have had them there already ,,,, You kid yourself!
2007-03-05 10:13:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html //So much for ETHICS
2007-03-05 09:46:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If what you described actually ever happened, they would be crimes.
Since they didn't, it's time for you to quit beating a dead Liberal horse.
2007-03-05 09:47:30 · answer #6 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
What! They finally charged Clinton??
2007-03-05 09:47:09 · answer #7 · answered by Curt 4 · 6⤊ 4⤋