English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Check out WIKIPEDIA. What was his crusade for control designed to do? I am liberal, but know it won't work. All I want is military grade weapons to be diminished. Did NYC just want to scare it's citizens into submission?
Also, how did The Mayor pick such a corrupt man as Bernard Kerik as police commisioner, when the appointment was fought by good police? Kerik was nominated for federal marshall or something, and reporters found out he is just a crook?
I just get tired of seeing Giuliani presented as big hero, when he even messed up before and after 9/11.

2007-03-05 00:49:36 · 7 answers · asked by peter s 3 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

See i think you're a bit confused.. The weapons the assault weapon ban covers aren't military grade and none of them are even actual assault weapons.
Assault weapons are full auto and those have been illegal for decades without a lengthy background check, approval from your local chief of police, and tax stamp to the ATF. The weapons the ban covers just look evil according to the anti gun nuts. Rudy Giuliani turned New York City into a corrupt police state. He knows gun control doesn't work even DC's mayor has admitted that gun control only disarms law abiding citizens and not criminals .Giuliani is no hero and personally i don't think he stands a chance at being elected.

2007-03-05 01:13:55 · answer #1 · answered by . 6 · 1 1

a extensive area of elections and politics is the lesson of being able to work out by way of appearances. The mainstream media is a puppet that places in simple terms the visual attraction obtainable. we could desire to consistently look heavily to work out the actual individual. Giuliani used 911 for political hay.

2016-10-02 10:10:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well everyone is different if you vote for Hillary Clinton that's a waste of your vote. That some one who dose nothing but get a pay check **** she wasn't an new yorker until her home state wanted nothing to do with her? keep you liberal Ideas out of the political arena but as far As I can see you Thoughts is just that an Thoughts and you Know what my Thoughts of your ------???

fill in with what you thought are!!!!!! I will with mine!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-03-05 01:05:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I guess you would prefer Hillary who has done absolutely nothing for America. Rudy was there for New York when she needed him and he helped pull the whole nation together when we were attacked by the terrorists. I disagree with Rudy on many issues but I believe he is a good man with America's best interests at heart.

2007-03-05 01:09:43 · answer #4 · answered by slodana2003 4 · 0 2

I am a social Conservative, and would never vote for Guiliani. I do believe the media has made this womanizing, cheating, kids leaving man out to be something he is obviously NOT.

2007-03-05 00:56:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

As a libertarian, I find it funny that conservatives read the riot act to "liberals" for taking away gun rights, when it was republicans who seem to be behind it the most.

GW Bush recently extended the Brady Bill...is that pro 2nd amendment?

2007-03-05 00:54:38 · answer #6 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 1 2

I know one more than one occasion he has been out in public dressed in drag.

I know that he was married to his cousin.

EEeeeeeeewwwww!

2007-03-05 00:55:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers