What do you think about Hillary Clinton's Morals?

Question

Below Ladies and Gentleman we have a very intellegent person named TECHX69 look at his statement! How educated he must be!!!!!

Answer 1

What morals? To her, it's okay to be a solcialist in a Republic. It's okay that her husband cheated on her. It's okay to over-tax people. It's okay to change your mind, after she voted yes, to have a war in Iraq. Those don't sound like morals, to me.

Answer 2

My grandmother had a saying - "When you sleep with the pigs, don't be surprised if you smell like one".

In other words, you will influenced and judged by the company you keep. I think it must have been an old Welsh saying.

I answered a recent Yahoo question of "Why are politicians corrupt", with the following:

For the ultimate answer write to:
The Honorable William J. Clinton
Impeached President of the United States
55 W. 125th Street
New York NY 10027

Ask how a poor boy from Hope entered the White House with near to nothing, and after leaving office is now a multi-multi millionaire (paybacks / kickbacks are very profitable).

Quote from the "honorable" Mr. Clinton:
"I never had a nickel to my name until I got out of the White House, and now I'm a millionaire, the most favored person for the Washington Republicans," Clinton told a friendly audience in Kentucky last fall. "I get a tax cut every year, no matter what our needs are."

The New York investment giant Goldman Sachs paid him $650,000 for four speeches in recent years. Its employees and PAC have given Hilary Clinton's political funds $270,000 since 2000 -- putting it second on the list of her most generous political patrons.

Meanwhile, Clinton has the "William J. Clinton Foundation". The foundation has enabled the Clintons to write off more than $5 million from their taxable personal income since 2001, while dispensing $1.25 million in charitable contributions over that period.

Best estimates place their personal wealth (cash / investments) at $40 million +

Source(s):

Various, including
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...

Answer 3

I think she was willing to give authority to go to war to a man she knew was lying because she lacked the guts to tell the American people, who were, at the time, in a mindless lovefest with the lying warmonger, that the war was a sham.

Therefore, I think she is willing to let people die to get what she wants.

In this way, she is like george bush, and therefore is despicable. However, he started this mass murder, he is profiting from it, not her, so she is less evil and more moral than george.

some endorsement.

Answer 4

The actions of the Clinton's have been an assault on The morals of America. They could have done a better job if they tried, it's as if their actions in this area was intentional

Answer 5

I think that the needle on her moral compass points towards the highest poll rating and not towards a reasoned moral thought process based on an ideal or philosophy.

Answer 6

I am sure that in her own mindset she believes that she does. Yet I have seen no evidence of such from her actions. She has proved time and again that she will say whatever is required to gain support. This type of behavior does not indicate morals or integrity.

Answer 7

Comparable to Bills

Answer 8

I think that they are as good or better than the morals of any president in my lifetime going back to Eisenhower.

Answer 9

Her morals are based on what the polls say that day.

Answer 10

I do not see any,,,so that is what i think about her morals,at least one can predict her ,she is so gullible and predictable,because of that fact..freepress