no all the teams should have equal chances of playing my friend- it is like comparing chalk and chees agreed but how can you expect these nations to improve if you do not give them big game experience>?
the world cup is all about promoting the game to a global audience, if by gaining this knowledge it increases the number of players wanting to play for their countries in these floundering countries then why would you not let them play.
Cricket is aas much about the ideal as the game. thats just the way it works.
cheers and hope this helped.
2007-03-05 09:38:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
12. This accomodates the ten try sides and 2 qualifiers. we choose the qualifiers as they could reason upsets and in the event that they do nicely its frequently between the thoughts of the tournament. And it promotes the activity of cricket in that united states of america. sixteen is in simple terms too many and motives the tournament to be too long. 8 does not accomodate all the try international locations not to show any qualifiers. as nicely, it somewhat is the 'international Cup', not the Elite try Cup. Any united states of america recognized by potential of FIFA can enter the soccer international cup, and any group that enters can attain the finals. there are such dissimilar associate and associate contributors of the ICC, why could desire to they not take transport of the prospect to play the great boys interior the tournament? yet basically 2 qualifiers, not 6 - too many lifeless video games and too long. additionally, regardless of if it somewhat is sixteen communities, do 4 communities of four, however the perfect 2 could desire to flow into quarter finals not a great 8. Its the excellent 6 and great 8 that make the tournament too long.
2016-10-17 07:39:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cannot see how stopping the lesser known cricketing nations participate in the World Cup will help the game of cricket. By allowing teams such as Scotland and Canada to be involved in the cricket world cup we are creating a bigger pool of cricket fans and also heightening interest in the sport.
2007-03-04 23:46:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by joey_mook 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
all are good
India have everything and more
The team of 2007 is very steady.
Factors helping India -
The best indian team going for the World Cup after the 1983 Presidential Cup. India has found good openers in Ganguly and Uthappa, with Sehwag in there too. Yuvraj, Dravid, Dhoni and Tendulkar steady the middle order to form one of the best middle order batting. Lower middle order of Kumble, Harbhajan, Zaheer can hit a few runs too.
As on bowling - Zaheer and Sreesanth/Munaf Patel will be opening and are not as bad. Kumble, Harbhajan and Sachin - Sehwag can bowl many spin overs between them. That leaves one guy extra. He can be employed as a strike bowler - Irfan/Sreesanth or Dinesh Kaarthick as the 11th guy. Irfan can bat as well.
It is a very powerful batting line-up, and make take a beating on their bowling lineup.
Quality Fielders are in plenty - Yuvraj, Uthappa, Sachin, Kaarthick. Fielders like Munaf Patel will have to be hided on the field.
There are all winning chances for India. India will reach the semi-finals for sure.
India have enjoyed a great run in previous world cups as well.
In 1979 we were almost through to semis. In 1983 we won the cup. In 1987 we were in the semis. In 1996 we were in semis (because of indian crowd, match given to Sri Lankans). In 1999 we beat Pakistan (who earlier beat Australia). Then in 2003 we reached the finals.
Somethings which India need to work on to improve for the World Cup 2007 in the Caribbean -
Every Indian Player Has To Think About The Country Not Individual.
Play As A Team
Making of Master Game plan before every match
Play Mind games With Every Team
Good Net Practice Before Every Match
Relaxation Techniques
Good Fielding
Players Should Be Absolutely Fit Before Every Match
2007-03-05 16:17:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Oye chak de phatte!! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is little bit of Uncertainities also(in cricket). Any one can make it to the victory! Some popular cricketer told that the victory is concerned with only how a team play at that time.
2007-03-05 03:16:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by jagan1986 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not like that but all the other teams should try to win .The 8 teams are fully formed thats why they have no qualifying match.Now
IRISH team had told that "We will win any of 8 teams and we have put a team plan to win the teams like aussies".
2007-03-04 23:49:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Allowing the lesser nations helps further vricketing stars of the future and helps the format of the competition. 10 teams competing isn't a very good number for a knockout competition
2007-03-04 23:54:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by parkesmatt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No every Nation Get Chance
If u dont allow any kid to play cricket with elder s
How can he be a Good Cricketer
So it is same for that nations also
We must allow them to get internation experience
2007-03-04 23:47:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that more teams should play , it should be bigger like soccer. It will be more exciting.
2007-03-05 02:14:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rahima Liverpool 4 life 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
agree
2007-03-05 18:19:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋