lol...you have the mathematics to support your theory? remember you have to show unification of the 4 forces in a mathematical framework, example: how gravity mathematically relates and interacts with the weak, strong, and electromagnetic forces. Forgive my skepticism but i doubt you actually have all the mathematics of this down....
But that being said, if you really think you have anything of merit, a good first place might be your local university physics department. Find a prof, bring your notes, and let him look over them, and talk with him. That gets past the problem of you having glaring physics errors since he would probably find them.
Second, you could try to submit an abstract to somewhere like the American Physical Society. They have a submission page for abstracts, but you have to be a member. If you really think you have something, the $100 or so registration fee shouldnt stop you.
After this, if its even looked at by anyone, your theory will be subjected to probably decades of others trying to disprove it and experiment with it. IF it holds up through that you MIGHT get a Nobel prize in 20 or 30 years. Eisteins 1921 Nobel prize was for work he did in 1905, and he was Einstein...
Remember the cardinal rules of theories: First you're wrong, then your right, then someone has done it already.
My best advice...if you're in college or going to be soon, go into physics, since unless you're an absolute genius (Einstein caliber), you probably wont be taken seriously from outside the field.
2007-03-04 23:57:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beach_Bum 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
>Scientists are on the brink of proving this thought. incorrect. For one subject, 'unified field thought' isn't a properly-defined thought real now. that's in simple terms a placeholder call for that thought which unites standard relativity and quantum physics, in spite of style it could prove to have. for yet another subject, whether some progression has been made provided that Einstein's time, scientists do no longer look quite on the brink of looking a efficient thought to extra healthful those standards. For a 0.33 subject, theories at the instant are not shown or disproven, as a results of fact technology does no longer deal in evidence; theories are in simple terms substantiated with the help of evidence or no longer. >could you nonetheless carry on the brink of your thought that the existence of God is unproven? i do no longer see why looking a unified field thought could have plenty to do with the existence of God. >could it is going to likely be no longer something wanting God dropping with the help of for coffee? i think of that must be sufficient. >Einstein stated he ought to instruct God's existence if he ought to instruct the UFT So what?
2016-10-02 10:06:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have to share your theory before collecting your prize. Then you go to Stockholm. I would love to hear the theory, by the way. Does it involve oil painting?
2007-03-04 23:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Biznachos 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Publish it.
Note: You will not get a Novel Prize as that is reseverved for useful discroveries, not theoretical ones. Einstein's Prize was for the Photoelectric Effect, not Relativity.
2007-03-04 23:05:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Runa 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
You don't. First off you don't even know to capitialize Einstein, and second I seriously doubt you could even explain Einstein's theories or even know what you suppose to be unifying.
Prove me wrong.
2007-03-04 23:18:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bulk O 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
You can collect it in Stockholm, but it's invitation only (and white tie).
2007-03-04 23:15:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Iridflare 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Really? I'm still struggling with E=mc2!
2007-03-04 23:16:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by wheeliebin 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
publish it here and we will tell you if its any good
of course, if you are wrong, we will have to shoot you
2007-03-04 22:59:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋