Why is it so darn wrong for Iran to have nuclear energy programs Iran has need for the energy,so why bomb?

Question

seems like fox news has brainwashed 90% of you into thinking the way you think.your facts to are fox news based.your paraniod about Iran to have the nucler power they need for their future.anyway thank god for the freepress...

Amirama..are trying to say the reason you want iran not to have the bombs that they dont want anyway IS A JEWISH THING OR A ARABE problem and no real threat to the mighty U,S,A?,,I hope not cause I dont give a rats asss about other countrys dirty laundery...freepress

Answer 1

This one is really funny! As dangerous as nuclear energy is why would ANY country need this technology? Our government is supposedly so afraid of Iran having this capability yet; we have quite a few plants right here in this country with no real means to protect the public from an accident. It’s been said even Bin Laden did not want to target the Nuclear Power plants because it would have created a global problem (thus, affecting even the so called potential “martyr’s”).

We should be encouraging them to implement renewable energy programs. Solar, Wind and Sea based solutions. OOPS! I'm making sense here! The very same thing SHOULD be in the implementation phase in IRAQ. Why isn't there any real push by our government to implement these clean, non polluting energy sources right here in the US? The people that have the politico’s in their pockets would no longer make the gangster amounts of money they do today.

Now to address the bomb issue specifically.

The US does not want Iran with this technology because it could lead to a bomb program (it’s a valid point, but a punk-assed excuse). Did anyone notice how timidly the US approached North Korea? Everyone knows the absolute mess that would be caused by a nuclear exchange (remember bin laden).

Kim Jung Ill (or however you spell it) is being portrayed as a nut case. That's to give the impression they are ready to use the weapons they do have. You know what? It's worked! All the threats and crap talk the president and rumsfeld blurted out was toned down quite nicely once they figured out this guy just might be crazy enough to push the button.

It seems like the worlds police force got punked by a man with a very strange hair style. Pakistan is in the exact same position. If we double cross them (Pakistan), there will be hell to pay. Once a government has the nuclear pimp stick, our government seems to change its tune.

If our government believes the real intent is for Iran to make bombs, they won’t know how to deal fairly with yet another "third world country". All of a sudden, all the Saber rattling rhetoric becomes hollow babblings of the worlds cop. The plot changes from we can just run you over to “we might be in a radioactive mess if we start bombing”. Anyone with good sense knows our government wants OIL and will destabilize any country to get it. Having that Nuclear PimpStick suddenly makes that process much harder.

It's not wrong. Our government just does not like to play fair.

Answer 2

Its no longer peacefull. yet that may no longer the actual difficulty, somewhat some worldwide places have nuclear weapons that we at the instant are not paranoid of, yet Iran has a reported place that Israel shouldn't exist and that given the possibility Iran could harm Israel. that's what scares the U. S., being that Israel is an best chum. We pursued nuclear technologies and nonetheless do, we are the only u . s . a . to ever drop no longer one yet 2 bombs. So for us to disclaim a rustic no longer our best chum to pursue nuclear is hypocritical and between the excuses we've a puzzling time in international kinfolk. We additionally understand that to bypass to conflict could be a significant conflict no longer in simple terms a low point conflict like Iraq, so we will not in simple terms bomb them to rubbish. i do no longer choose Iran to have a nuclear weapon, yet our significant weapon, our militia we're not prepared to apply, and Iran is acquainted with that. I worry that sanctions will in simple terms serve to make Iran extra obdurate and desperate interior the long-term. The religous clerics fairly run that u . s . a ., no longer the typical standard Iranian.

Answer 3

If we had 1/2 the Oil Iran has we would have NO nuclear energy plants in the USA. If we said we have a goal and a religion that tells us to wipe ( insert country of choice here) of the face of the earth, why would anyone let us? Iran will not be here long enough to find out the answers to these questions though.

Answer 4

Iran has a long history of giving weapons to terrorists. The U.S. doesn't want a nuclear bomb to be smuggled across the border and detonated in the U.S.

The real problem is China. China is helping Iran enrich uranium and China is against putting sanctions on Iran. At the same time, China is pointing more and more nukes at America, and Russia is pointing less nukes at America.

Iran doesn't need nuclear energy. It only wants uranium to build nuclear bombs.

Iran has the second largest supply of natural gas in the world. It has enough natural gas to power the country for hundreds of years.

This will help you to understand:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2005/iran-fuel-cycle-brief_dos_2005.pdf
"Iran’s past history of concealment and deception and nuclear fuel cycle infrastructure are most consistent with an intent to acquire nuclear weapons."

Answer 5

Iran has huge oil reserves, they do not have a far simpler technology to convert crude into fuel, but they choose not to invest in this technology, that will supply their energy needs very easily, neither do they invest in power stations that work on natural gas, of which they also have huge reserves, they select to invest in nuclear energy, supposedly for production of energy, but this is nothing but trickery on their side, and the bluff is not very good either.
I think that this regime should be prevented from developing nuclear capability, because they are going to use it, and not to produce energy but to threaten their neighbors.

Answer 6

where or where do you liberals come up with this stuff. first of all NO ONE IS BOMBING IRAN.....second, its a matter of trust. if you feel comfortable putting the potential to make a nuclear bomb in the hands of known terrorist supporters than you should agree with the pelosi ites. on the other hand, if you understand that giving iran the power and ability to destroy the earth is a real threat than your question is liberal pap. it depends on what side of the fence you reside. its wrong because of the temptation to destroy the world communnity for not seeing things the way iran does and there are people in power who would love to do that.

Answer 7

Utilizing your logic, we should provide Jack the Ripper with a large assortment of knives, as he has to eat, right?

NOT!

Psycho killers like the Ripper and iran can not be allowed to have things that, although they have a peaceful purpose, can be used as weapons.

Answer 8

Two words: Zionist Lobby

Answer 9

There is a differnce between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons....

Maybe you should figure out what you are talking about before asking idiotic questions.

Answer 10

Because, Israel and US don't like a possibity of Iran to be a nuke power and may wipe out Israel from the earth.