I third the first answer.
You have to
1) prevent them from getting into office. (not possible in a two party system and a nation of uneducated slaves convinced they are free just because they get to choose between coke and pepsi)
Or
2) punish/kill them. The courts, prosecutors, and congressmen won't do this. Only we will. Maybe if you get enough terminally ill people pissed off enough they will opt for state sponsored assisted suicide and do their country a favor at the same time. But honestly we are so incredibly monitored and controlled That you could never do it. You really have NO idea, I'm talking stuff you have not even seen on sci fi shows not just 15 years old millimeter wave b.s. and phased array satellite monitoring of 90% of inhabited areas. Does it not suprise you that virtually no one in our government has been killed in the last 20 years? I know of a couple judges. Thats it. There has to be way more psychos out there than that, never mind patriots. It just is not plausible. Heck, I'm suprised they haven't killed a few of their own just to convince us we are not cattle. These people are evil and not open to conflicting opinions or open discussion. If you disagree with them and inconvenience them (which is all you can do because you are not a theat no matter how hard you try) they won't just kill you, they will go back in time and cut off your grand daddy's balls. If you are lucky.
This world is owned. All globalization efforts I am aware of are top-down which means the idea is to have a global tyrany. I know of no bottom up globablization efforts, which are designed to prevent this and keep people free - like the articles of confederation. It does not matter who wins. UN, commies, Bahai, freemasons, satanists, luciferians, oto, cia, whatever. (bahai people and most masons are actually pretty cool) Once a top-down global system is in place all the players will be compromised (if they are not already) and this planet will be fubar. When I was younger I wrote a paper titled something like "A Systems Theoretical Approach to World Government" Oh boy did I get into trouble for that. At the time I liked the idea of world government. I was going to try to prove it was a good idea using systems/complexity theory. By the time I was done with the report I had shown strong evidence that we are in late stages of a hostile global takeover. The first person I showed it to called someone and we had some NASTY visitors. The report was confiscated, like some of my other writings have been. I thought about re writing it. It won't do any good but I don't plan on shutting up. Wish me luck when they take me to gitmo.
2007-03-04 21:08:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by - 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
hi :) The question you are able to be asking is why do such truly some human beings help isreal? i do not help them personaly, i do experience for the palastinians... Isreal became their position of starting place first, and the isrealis deal with them as imigrants of their own u . s .. yet to respond to your question, you're making valid aspect's yet....to stop isreali crimes hostile to palastinians, then you definately could stop palastinian crimes hostile to isreal. it truly is not any reliable denying it does no longer take position, or infact one aspect is more suitable to blame than the different, because contained in the top retaliation leads to retaliation, and each little thing only finally ends up a mess. i imagine it truly is time both aspect elected leaders who've the international locations perfect pastimes at heart and sit and really make a wise compromise, without something of the global butting into their organization. As you reported something of the global, then we dont percentage an identical u . s . and perhaps are both more suitable forgiving or have more suitable problems with our own which desire looked after out.
2016-12-05 06:26:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Put politicians on trial for passing laws that clearly violate the Constitution of the United States. Create a judicial oversight committee with non-lawyers as members as well that would determine if passing the law is deemed punishable. Passing things such as the patriot act or military commison's act would require a mandatory prison time.The rule of law is a serious matter and politicans who violate it should be punished more severely than regular citizens.
2. Ban corporate gifts to legislators.
3. Offer no benefits for being a congressman and senator other than standard pay. No retirement plan unless they serve 3 terms. Make them live by the laws they pass. Not take from us but keep the bennies for themselves.Being convicted of doing anything else is jailtime.
If they commit treason by approving arms sales to enemy states, well we already have a law for that.
2007-03-04 18:42:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Correctlinguistics 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
not allowing polliticians to make it a career
polliticians need to serve there term then go home back to their real jobs
maybe then they would do whats best for their communities and the future instead of whats best for their carreers
also second the first answer
2007-03-05 01:14:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
your question is wrong. it should be how to reduce crime in politics?
2007-03-04 19:07:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
By opposing it at what ever plat form we have from our ballot paper to PIL in the gourt
2007-03-04 19:31:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
you start to shoot who is commit a crime
2007-03-04 22:28:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gunny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
first feel your responsible for your nation , you are also responsible
for this crisis stop blaming others question your self are you not responsible for politics of our country?
2007-03-04 18:44:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by jay 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I forth the first answer and second the second answer
2007-03-04 22:29:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by name game.com 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I second the first answer
2007-03-04 18:41:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ken B 5
·
1⤊
1⤋