I have suggestion to evolutionist in connection with presence of vestigial organ?

Question

It is possible have vestigial organ with out evolution:-
I make first document in MS word WITHOUT any formatting & second document in MS word with very good formatting.
I do this because I think MS Word is best option for me then notepad where much formatting is not allowed. Space in my hard disk is not problem for me

Now in first case if you say that there is much vestigial thing & this is only necessary in second case so first document has evolved from second document. Which is not correct because I am creator. So vestigial organ do not necessarily confirm evolution it only says what tools creator (tools may be improved with time)used while making species. This same principle is seen even in electronic gadgets of today.

Probably this did not come to mind of Darwin as in those days in every day life as there were no comman tools to do differnt jobs which are apperantly disconnected. So he said unless creator had plan to mislead us there should not be any vestigial organ

My postulation is, when one makes different complicated structures, He or she will make some common tools, which are useful in making similar analogical functions, in different structures, hence there is tendency for vestigenicity, by virtue of common tool being used.
So Vestigenicity does not preclude possibility of creator

I don not say that, there is no relationship between different species. I just say there is intelligent design which dictates natural selection & other mechaisum of evolution. & vestigial organ as understood are not misleaders for creationist theory

Answer 1

I will give you my explanation so that you reorientate your thoughts.
Vestigial organs show that while these organs are nonfunctional in one animal, they are functional in others. For example,muscles of pinna are vestigial in man but functional in dogs, elephants etc.
It concludes that the genes for muscles in pinna are present in all these animals. Similar genes come from common ancestor.
So, somewhere down the line these mammals had a common ancestor possessing these genes.

Answer 2

There is really no such thing as vestigial organs. It is just a term applied to some body parts that scientist do not understand the purpose of. All doctors/scientist do not believe that some organs are vestigial. Yes there parts of our bodies that can be removed without serious harm, but that does not mean they are useless.

Answer 3

comparison between evolution of life and improvisation of modern technology is unfair . if it is fair comparison by any stretch of imagination then darwin = god

Answer 4

do u still believe that somebody created this world ?