Because it can not be nuclear weapons since it was reported in 2005 that Iran won't be able to make a nuclear weapon in 10 years , see this link - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/01/AR2005080101453_pf.html
2007-03-04 17:38:25 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Maybe George is looking for those Weapons of Mass Destruction that he didnt find in Iraq?
Without Colin Powell and Donald Rumsfeld, which scapegoat can he use to go before the United Nations and convince / fool them that the weapons of Mass destruction were misplaced - Saddam didnt put them in Iraq, but put them in Iran for safe keeping!.
Or maybe he can invade Iran on humanitarian grounds - tell the world that because Iran has a nasty militant Islamic leadership, that we need to invade to free all them Iranians?
And then, after blowing them up, we can give refugee status to the survivors, and let Haliburton in to clean up the mess, and use tax payers dollars on abused contracts, and ask the tax payers to provide free health care and government welfare?
2007-03-04 18:01:33 · answer #1 · answered by Big B 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That report may be correct -- or not. In any event, the US has not invaded Iran, and has no present intention to do so. But if Iran keeps sneaking weapons into Iraq to kill Americans, that may change. Note that Iran has threatened aggression against Israel; if that should occur, the results for Iran will be catastrophic.
2007-03-05 01:49:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
More contracts to follow for Haliburton ?
No, it won't happen. There won't be an "invasion" as with an occupying force. There could possibly be a military strike in order to send a message and delay completion of an Iranian nuclear weapon capability.
2007-03-05 02:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by tc 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If anything drives us into Iran it will be a failed Iraq policy. They have already started the rhetoric against Iran stating that they are supplying terrorists in Iraq money and weapons. And then those resources in return are being used to kill American soldiers.
Look deeper, the answers are there.
2007-03-05 01:51:38 · answer #4 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because of the same reasons to invade Iraq:
1) Zionist loopy wants to secure the region to Israel.
US want to secure the region for Israel.
2) The policy of domination and spread of forces.
2007-03-05 04:39:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
1) We won't invade, we will bomb.
2) Stopping their nuke program WILL be the real reason.
3) The Washington Post is far from authoritative.
4) Better to bomb them 3 years too soon than 3 seconds too late.
2007-03-05 03:28:42 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To stop Iran selling their oil in Euros!!!! Exactly the same reason that Iraq was attacked!
2007-03-05 05:37:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no it's not nuclear weapon, but they are using it as an excuse. Maybe the reason is Iranian Government. But I too believe the reson is OIL.
by the way Iranians are not ARAB.
2007-03-05 01:57:16 · answer #8 · answered by hana 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
to establish a pipeline to the caspian sea which holds 11-13 trillion dollars of oil.
2007-03-05 01:47:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Becuse they are supplying the insurgents in Iraq. But i really hope we dont.
2007-03-05 01:46:20 · answer #10 · answered by Chris 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋