http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070304/pl_nm/people_coulter_dc
2007-03-04 16:06:07 · 10 answers · asked by j b 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Like them or not, agree or disagree, love her or hate her, the same right you have to choose, she also has. Her opinion has as much right as all the others. The fact that she is in total disagreement with many opinions do not make the other opinions less wrong, or more correct. What we have is the choice to read or disagree, but not to censor anyones beleifs under the right to free speech granted all americans. Personally I think her opinions are a bit over the top at times but I agree with her completely when she expresses her dislike of homosexual behaviour. They too have rights, but to my way of beleif, I think they are immoral, evil, and their actions belong behind closed doors.
2007-03-04 16:20:20 · answer #1 · answered by Myron 4 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Ms Coulter makes a living by using insults and hate in way to make money. Her comments for example of the wives whose husbands died on 9-11 show here lack of compassion. She appeals to those of the far right.
2007-03-06 00:19:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've noticed over the years that any debate starts with demonizing your opponent. The facts are overlooked in the ensuing hubbub.
Forensics actually has a word for this; ad hominem which means basically what I said above.
I look for the facts and after I override my emotions, apply a little critical thinking to the issue. In this case, and many others, she's just trying to get some attention and re-direct attention from the issues. Which at this point, I don't know what they are.
2007-03-04 17:13:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Coulter is a media whore. I place her in the same category as Spears, Hilton and Lohan. People without brains or any kind of talent flash their privates or vomit hateful diarrhea from their mouths. Coulter's a hack who is just trying to draw attention to herself to push her third-rate "book". But I guess that trying to suck up as much money as you can is legitimate in American politics. So, I guess the answer is yes.
2007-03-04 23:59:05 · answer #4 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is a hate spewing piece of crap which would be publicly bull- whipped . In a attempt to hold something beneficial decrease back into American politics. "undesirable human beings are actually not irresponsible animasl" as she calls them
2016-12-14 11:00:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She, Al Sharpton and Charles Shumer are three people who make me reach automatically for the remote control. I know I'm going to be annoyed by either what they say, how they say it, or both.
2007-03-04 16:49:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. She does not encourage any critical thinking in the middle of a political debate. Because of people like her, the quality of political discourse in the US sucks. To her, everyone disagreeing with her is wrong and is with the terrorists, a completely outrageous notion.
And when you think Canada sent troops to Vietnam, and argue with a Canadian about it, that's just stupid:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/video_player.html?coulter_clip
2007-03-04 16:16:24 · answer #7 · answered by Scott F 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, she has made too many ignorant comments over the years.
http://inserttitleblog.com/?p=55
2007-03-04 16:15:44 · answer #8 · answered by bhalpern123 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely not. She is a sick creature and an embarrassment to the conservatives.
2007-03-04 16:12:12 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
she says what 'the base' is thinking...she is TYPICAL of conservative thought
2007-03-08 11:49:39 · answer #10 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋