George Bush haters...?

Question

I have a few questions for all of you Bush haters. First of all, I know for a fact that if Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan attacked the U.S., you would all hate George Bush for not stopping it. Yet when he does some prevention (a.k.a. the Iraq and Afghanistan wars), you still hate him. Isn't it better to be fighting there than here? It was going to happen sooner or later. Also, why do you blame him for Hurricane Katrina? He didn't send the storm to Louisiana. He also isn't responsible for evacuating the state, it's the governer's job to warn the citizens of a deadly storm. Why is everything Bush's fault when all he's doing is trying to look out for the welfare of the U.S.? Are you just ungrateful? Stop blaming him for all of the problems he has no control over!

Spool32-
You say there was no evidence that Iraq or Afghanistan was going to attack us.
#1 Afghanistan did attack us, well, a terrorist group from there did. We're really there helping Afghanistan people and eliminating the terrorists from the world.
#2 If Iraq did attack us, like we once thought, you would all blame George Bush for not stopping them. You're just a bunch of hypocrites that can't be satisfied.

You also said that Katrina was his fault because it was a large scale disaster. Okay, what about all of the other major hurricane's? The governer evacuated the states, not the president. Same as every other natural disaster.

boogityman-
I never said that Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan would form a union and attack the U.S., I'm saying that they are the ones that need our attention right now. We need to keep an eye on them because they are the most likely to attack the U.S. So is North Korea. If we don't watch them, then we have surprise attacks and World War 3 could start.

Longhaired Freaky Person,
War was in the Biblical times and it will be forevermore. God has been involved in wars and I think He supports them. You're peace marches and weed smoking won't stop that. War wins our freedom. It won it in the past and will continue to win it in the future. Maybe if you weren't high on marijuana, you could realize that.

penbuddy,
I somewhat agree with you. The U.S. doesn't need to be involved in other countries' affairs, but in this case, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan need to be watched as protection for the U.S. I think that's a logical reason to get involved.

cogs-
I sure am worried about Hitllary! ;)

tabethamarie2002,
Show me where I said that three countries attacked us. I didn't say that at all. I merely said that those three countries are/were threats to mine, yours, and everyone else in the U.S.'s life.

Gemini-
If we didn't invade countries we thought were threats, we could be dead by now. It's a safety issue, not a personal issue. What would happen if we thought a country was a threat but didn't act on it, then that country came and killed millions of people? I say it's better to find out the easier and faster way.

Roxxi S-
Sure, he should have gotten more help for the hurrican victims, but I also think those involved with Katrina could have done more on their part. Instead of raiding stores, raping women, and murdering people, they could have been rebuilding their houses or helping others get to safety. There's absolutely no reason to expect the government to take care of every little personal problem you have.

masterjack_98-
I have, infact, gone through the ninth grade. I wouldn't be fighting for Bush, I would be fighting for our country's freedom. My life is worth freedom. Keep telling yourself that and maybe you can gain some patriotism.

Zelda-
If the U.S. is ready for a woman president, it definitely should be Condi Rice. She is a great person.

ROSEY-
Don't call me buddy. I'm no friend of yours.

mark k-
True story. Well done!

Answer 1

Amen, Lex. Glad to hear from someone with common sense on this site. The terrorists must really get pumped up listening to the people in this country bashing our president. To bad we can't send our ungrateful over there. They will be the downfall of this country.
Usually the stupidist people I have ever met are the ones calling someone else stupid. They aren't smart enough to know their stupid.

Answer 2

First off I don't hate the president. I disagree with his policies. People give evidence that Iraq attack America and is responsible for 9/11. There is any evidence because in fact they are not reponsible for 9/11. The Afghanistan war is not the same as the Iraq war. We went into Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction, which were not found, not because of 9/11. Yes it's better fighting the terrorist on their own turf then in America. If all those soldiers that were sent to Iraq were sent to Afghanstan along with the ones there already then we would have had Ben Ladin by now. The person responsible for 9/11. Not only would they have gotten the head of Al Queda but also now all the troops would be free to go into Iraq if need be. No need for a troop surge they all would have been in the area anyway. Not divide between countries during a time of war.
I don't blame him for hurricane Katrina. However one doesn't promise people that we will rebuild it only promotes laziness and welfare!! There were other horrible disasters that happen under Clinton and the people got some federal money just like they did in New Orleans however Clinton didn't promise to rebuild it. Therefore those people got off there butts and started rebuilding their towns. If one allows people to be lazy. They will get laziness.
If he was truly willing out for welfare of the United States those boarder would be closed and no working permits for illegal. The terrorist can get in through those boarder just like the Mexicans do.
Here is the thing he might have no control over some problems however he has control over his actions that's caused a lot of the problems.

Answer 3

A lot of people are looking for a scapegoat and George Bush is an easy target. Frustration is rising with the war problems, frustration is rising with the slow restructure of the Katrina damage. Blame the guy at the top of the heap, the one with the most exposure to the world. We live in an instant gratification world, and when it takes longer than we want for that gratification, blame the president, who is supposed to be running the country exactly the way each of us want him to.. Could things have been done differently in either situation? Maybe, maybe not. Is it George Bush's fault? NO. Did he make the best decision in handling both situations? Maybe, maybe not. We do not have to like what he is doing or the decisions he is making, but it is unfair to blame him for these things. It is easier to point fingers than to find solutions. The best anyone can do is learn from the mistakes they may make so the same mistakes do not keep repeating themselves. So, if America made a mistake for voting Bush president, learn from it and make a more educated vote next time. Don't just sit there and blame!
Boy, you got your hands full with this question!!

Answer 4

Yes Bush hater here, and while we are on the subject I don't think very highly of Cheney either! I've seen prior post that Bush & Cheney are true Patriots, which is the furthest thing from the truth. Bush couldn't even handle National Guard Duty, he hid in a Cocaine oblivion. And Cheney did receive no less than 5 deferments to avoid fighting in Vietnam.
They both claimed we needed the insurgency in Iraq, when in fact history shows NO ONE has ever won an insurgency. All insurgencies throughout history have ended with a political accomodation and a political settlement, or GENOCIDE! (thats the alternative)
Both of these men are not qualified to run this Country, they are both babbling, money-hungry idiots!

And regarding Katrina, Bush praised FEMA for a job well done, before they even took proper action. In fact they never took proper action. So yes, Bush is responsible for FEMA's failure, not the Governor of Louisiana or the Mayor of New Orleans, Just BUSH! He was stopping to pose for pictures in New Orleans while viewing the destruction of Katrina, and that idiot was smiling like he was on a fishing trip!

Answer 5

Don't forget, George Bush is The Decider. This is his war, he ordained it and we all fell for it. Nobody I know ever had any problem with Bush going into Afghanistan after the terrorists. That's what he should have done. But then that took a backseat to his obsession with Hussein and Iraq. And surprise surprise none of the reasons he gave for going into Iraq were valid. No connection with 9/11, Clinton's policy of containment had worked - there were no WMDs. There also was no Al Queda in Iraq. Now they are crawling all over it because we blew that country wide open and they just walked right in. Now we're stuck in Baghdad policing a civil war while the Taliban gathers strength in Afghanistan and in the Western Province of Iraq. There's a reason Britain is pulling out of Iraq and heading to help NATO with the Taliban in Afghanistan. George Bush got his priorities mixed up at a crucial time in our history. We all believed he was doing the right thing, at least most of us did. We needed a leader so badly after 9/11 that we put all our trust in our new President and he used that shamelessly to support his bid to go to war in Iraq. Millions of Americans, and history, will never forgive him for that. Until he figures out that he has to solve the politics of Iraq before we can control the violence we are stuck inside of this chaos. In the meantime Al Queda laughs at us for being so bogged down in Baghdad that they have almost no resistance for their new training camps and burgeoning cells.

Katrina? Don't even get me started...

Answer 6

You know the saying.......You can please some of the people some of the time!!
Like it or not, MR Bush had the gonads to do something! Right or not.And something is better than nothing!!! No one person can predict what will happen tomorrow, let alone in a war! It is not a game!! you don't go home after 8 innings. Our freedom and much else is at stake!!
And thank you for the support. Mark

Answer 7

Second of ALL , Your 1st of All Statement . is ALL Right, because Like Myself The Rest Of ya'All Bush haters . are, "in MY Book" A BIT of ALL Right..... which takes us Too your All would still hate him(mol) Which Since this about ALL the time iI can spend on this.. So My Answer Will Be Final ALL Inclusive. Your 2nd Sentence is ALL WRONG !!! Sept. 11th WAS an INSIDE JOB !! Evidentley not ALL of us Have done Our Homework !!! That said , I bid You Adieu, and a Thhhh Thaaa.... "THAT'S ALL FOLKS"

Answer 8

The fights taking place there are a mere smokescreen to take away attention to what is happening here. Wake up. Bush now has the congress and senate he really wanted. The supposed fights between him and the dems is just another smokescreen. Iknow this is not what you wanted to hear, but for the love of YHWH, wake up. haven't you ever found it odd that every time the illegal immigration debate heats up, the Chinese are blowing up satellites and rapidly building up their military, The Russians are building up their military over the next eight years, or the Taliban is now regaining its strength? Why dont you ask our fearless leader about what is being constructed underground over in Europe to supposedly test the big bang theory. Now this would make interesting news.

Answer 9

Amen!!! Rather fight on their soil than ours!
George could come up with the cure for cancer and the D.A. libs would still hate him..
Thanks to to God that GB has the cahones to actually do what he says! I am glad the we didn't have someone like Gore in office when we needed a real man.. and as for Bill... he had 8 years to handle Osama,and Sadam, but he didn't... Gore actually laughed him off..
In the future when our America has been turner over to the terrorists (aww, because ACLU will make sure they are given their rights) we will look back at GB and see what a great man he really was.
John Howard (PM of OZ) was correct when he said the terrorists are just waiting for the Dems to take over.

If Hillary becomes president, I will remain an expat and stay out of the US....

I wish Condi would run... now she is a class act..

Answer 10

I disapproved of Bush during the 2000 campaign because he had never accomplished anything as an individual. Everything he's ever had, is because of his father's connections.

Maybe Gore was a geek, But I'd like to think that the President should be someone capable of writing a book.

Answer 11

Lex, I can't believe you all aren't getting sick and tired of all that Bush tail whacking. It's a propaganda machine and you're totally fooled by it. Wake up.