English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-04 15:50:28 · 4 answers · asked by mysteryhack 3 in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

The problems are the product itself over a period of time has a tendency to become unstable . It enhances opposing countries fear of you and thus induces a reaction to do as you are doing. Governments over the years in most of the higher power countries have at times had leadership that is not entirely opposed to using these bombs and there is nothing to show that worse in the way of leadership could not happen .

2007-03-04 15:58:40 · answer #1 · answered by burning brightly 7 · 1 0

What's to "explain"? Logic dictates- the more Atomic bombs there are floating around the World- the more likely there's GOING to be a nuclear "accident" or terrorist attack with one. It's just a matter of time... AND, the MORE countries that have those weapons- the MORE likely it's GOING to happen. So it's not a question of "whether"... -but WHEN... ... It's kinda like what happened on 9/11... Everyone knew that someday terrorism would visit us...-& on THAT day, it arrived. And it will- again...

2007-03-05 00:07:11 · answer #2 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 0

just 3 words.
1) mutually
2) assured
3) destruction

2007-03-05 00:00:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That damn charred carcass feeling you can get from it. That's one of the bigger issues I have with it.

2007-03-04 23:53:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers