I wonder why one is called a Crown Prince or Princess.. and another is called 'simply' Prince or Princess. What is the distinction?
2007-03-04 14:29:33 · 6 answers · asked by Nancy 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
The crown prince is the eldest son, the heir to the throne. The eldest daughter is called the princess royal, that is the title of princess Anne. She is accually older than her brothers but only the eldest son becomes King, only if there are no sons does a daughter become queen. That is why princess anne isnt in the procession of the throne at all, she has brothers, and they have sons
2007-03-04 20:21:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Crown Prince is the heir apparent, first in line for the throne. The title is used in the Danish and some other European monarchies, it is not used in Britain. If it were used in Britain, Charles would be the Crown Prince but Andrew and Edward would be just Princes.
2007-03-05 02:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by tentofield 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"Crown Prince" generally refers to the heir apparent to the monarchy - in Britain's case, Charles is the Crown Prince because he would be King if Lizzy dies, but Andrew is merely a Prince because he's pretty far down the line of succession.
I've also heard the title used for the monarch of countries (such as Monaco) where the monarch has the rank of Prince rather than King.
2007-03-05 11:34:21 · answer #3 · answered by JerH1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The eldest daughter of a king or queen is called Princess Royal. In the British royal family, the title does not automatically go to the eldest daughter. It is conferred by the Queen, and Princess Anne was given it for her extensive charity work.
2007-03-05 16:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Princess in legal term means daughter of a king. However a king cannot be a king if he doesnt have any title or in short properties inhirited upon birth, So therefore a child by inheritance is be addressed according to the nature of his inheritance, Take for example King Christian X, upon the birth of his 3rd son Margould 1900 Denmark has expanded terretory covering Unified Germany , So Margould was baptized as the Earl of Armenia, Earl because He was the 3rd son thats for the new terretory, And the Earl of Armenia has to inherit also Donauworth of King Frederick the Great as the 9th Duke of Marlborough. Actually the richer the King the more title to earned as long as the child has past all the genocide test. Okay what if the child cannot meet the standard of test even how the mother claimed the child was the king's son/daughter, to be honest the child was considered desgrace. And I think this is all the reason of political upleaval of Europe after ww2. This problem has actually resolved by constitutional will and by political parliamentary will in notion against the will of the King, to designate dummies in the royal throne. Denmark 1976 Queen protocol was not in reality related to the incombent royal family ,doesnt have actually a dominiom tittle but permitted to published propaganda genealogy for the sake of allege freedom of expression and quote.
The European public accepted the idea that anyone is intitled to be addressed as princess regardless of no properties in donimium domain affinity attached in your name and birthright. By Statute absolute law the dummy Queen is actually considered a squater. But for the sake of Culture from 1974 to present, Citizens of Denmark has by all means as I assist it personally by reading all those allege publications has accepted the flattery of a dummy con royalty.
Personally for me, it is not a good idea somewhere along the line this real owners of the land must surface and take initiative to seatle this despute with the government and save derrogation of royal genocide. After all the country's constitution and by laws depends its sanctity to the real genocide of the monarch who by all means in legal means acquired the whole nation by the power of purchased in honest to goodness for his family royalty sake. And I think its time for political renewal to simply respect the right of these valid willed claimant. So we can have a genuine flattery.
In strick royal standard and by legal means you cannot be a princess /princes if you don't have a land or aquired properties that can qualify you to the crown, Charles has inherited wales so he was crowned prince of wales 1971 in UK together with the princess of Armenia 1971 in DK. If the parliament the Minister of Foreign Affairs has declared you HRH Princess of no land,then whats now atleast a princess by political notion, the Minister was very very rich and rich and powerful to have a deluding approval from parliament. Can I upply and have also my millions? I think I'm very qualified how about you guys?
I just hope I didnt hurt anyone by telling the truth. My apology. And request to save this for future refferences. Thank you.
Toast ...Noblesse!
2007-03-05 23:14:50 · answer #5 · answered by PRINCESS AQUIRAH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a crown princess is one born into royalty rather than acquiring a royal title through marriage. For example, Princess Anne is a crown princess. Fergie was not.
2007-03-04 22:36:37 · answer #6 · answered by Kble 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋