if we could do you think it would be morally right to make a person out of dead matter. I need points for not moral
2007-03-04 14:27:12 · 14 answers · asked by Stephanie 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No it would not be morally correct.
2007-03-04 14:30:19 · answer #1 · answered by It's been awhile 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll give you an answer of "immoral", maybe two:
First, the metaphysical one:
This question has an interesting spiritual implication. Like the construction of a human-equivalent android, the successful reanimation of dead tissue pretty much assumes that humans are nothing more than the sum of the parts that make up our physical bodies. That if somehow you get all the parts working again, you would have yourself a working human. However, to really be human, you have to either assume that there is no such thing as a "soul", or take the flimisy out that having created a sufficient vessel, that God would grant it a soul. I'll suggest that trying to force God's actions in such a way is likely to run against His will, which in religious circles is pretty much the definition of immoral.
That, and the much more mondane immorality of the desicration of the graves and memory of those that provided your source of parts.
Either way, still immoral. I think you should give up on a future as a mad scientist and take up something less likely to create trouble, lest you have to fend off hoards of people armed with garden tools.
Oh, and Frankenstein was the mad scientist. The creature was "Frankenstein's monster". The book was oddly the only one ever written by Mary Shelley.
2007-03-04 22:42:36 · answer #2 · answered by Jeffrey L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello. In my opinion it would not be morally right. But I think that the monster would be grateful for the gift of life. The monster, to add to the immorality, was made of several men's dead body tissue. There are many immoral and moral things about it.
2007-03-04 23:37:35 · answer #3 · answered by mind-scaper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The frankenstien book is good. hopefullly youve read the book and not just seen the movie, people think that the monsters name is frankenstein, and thats just the guy who made him, the creature was just called a creature.
but to answer your "q" No. thats Gods place to create people. Humans shouldnt "play God"
2007-03-04 22:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Oklahoma Economist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Frankenstein never scared me...marsupials do...cause they're FAST!!
2007-03-04 22:55:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um what? Oooh, look at all the letters that keep coming up! lalalalalalalalalalheheheheheheheheheehwhhooohhooooolfkdvnvoejerivnreovnfvnoervgbhoenrvjwoejifwoefnhjoighoijwefnguvfonoinoifoivjvnorehgreojergje
this is so much fun!
2007-03-04 22:31:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um.. ithink it's wrong but cool!
2007-03-04 22:33:30 · answer #7 · answered by RockSKid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't believe it would be right.
2007-03-04 22:32:17 · answer #8 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they kinda already do with cloning
2007-03-04 22:30:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not morel. Its also gross.
2007-03-04 22:32:59 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋