2007-03-04 14:07:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You may have to elaborate on this a little. Try being more specific.
2007-03-04 14:12:40 · answer #1 · answered by southfloridamullets 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Vietnam was the first war ever fought without any censorship. Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind.
- General William Westmoreland
2007-03-04 22:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Censorship is bull
I do agree that there is no place for hate speech or obscene pornography have to place. Generally the things that 99% of us would be offended by should not be accessed with such ease.
However with regards to our regular consumption, I believe it is up to use as the consumer to decide what we should and should not be viewing or hearing.
If a parent is too irresponsible to monitor their children and they are therefore exposed to offensive material I do not believe the average and more mature consumer should be denied the material.
2007-03-04 22:26:18 · answer #3 · answered by smedrik 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Except for child pornography, there should be no censorship. What a person reads or watches is his own business.
2007-03-04 23:57:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The question seems contradictory in the USA legally as we have freedom of speech.
Ideally no country would have censorship of any kind.
2007-03-04 22:12:01 · answer #5 · answered by spur_101 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
EDIT
This post has been censored for content to protect the affiliates of Yahoo! Answers.
2007-03-04 22:12:03 · answer #6 · answered by an_eshva 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
censorship is unconsitiutional. Freedom of speech, baby!!
Don't wanna hear it, don't listen!
2007-03-04 22:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by Tiff 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
***** censorship! Freedom of speech is the sh.it!
2007-03-04 22:17:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, but yahoo sure is.
2007-03-04 22:54:35 · answer #9 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋