2007-03-04 13:49:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I could see having a government channel, especially for government news and coverage of Congressional sessions or Supreme Court sessions or Presidential press releases, or maybe a new Democrat channel and a new Republican channel. These political channels could run extended campaign ads, information on the party's local candidates, State of the Union speeches, rebuttals, rebuttals of the rebuttals, and so on. (Yawn, I don't think I would watch them much, but someone might.)
But, the government should definitely not be allowed to take over or run any existing Network TV channels. This would interfere with freedom of the press, one of our basic constitutional rights.
2007-03-04 14:01:01 · answer #1 · answered by userafw 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
even as Ron Paul has some concepts that contact a great number of hardship-loose people, he merely seems to go back off the wall too usually. i'm reminded of John Edwards. the guy had a great number of concepts that appealed to me. yet for some reason I not in any respect got here across him a perfect candidate. of route now all of us understand slightly extra about his personality. btw i'm not in any respect comparing Edwards personality with Ron Paul I easily have some note of for Ron Paul.
2016-11-27 22:00:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not. Well of course unless you like the idea of Big Government
2007-03-04 14:10:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, they don't know what there doing, or how to run a country, don't let them run a network
2007-03-04 13:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
When Clinton was in office CNN and NBC was run by the government....
2007-03-04 13:54:31 · answer #5 · answered by kows4sale 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If yes thats means, you can only sees the good in the goverment not otherwise.
2007-03-04 15:03:18 · answer #6 · answered by anderson 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think if they tried the DNC might get pissed. I hear they are pretty territorial.
2007-03-04 13:56:25 · answer #7 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we live in democracy and freedom right?
so yes why not?
2007-03-04 13:52:56 · answer #8 · answered by Gunny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They already do in some ways ... My answer is no.
2007-03-04 14:00:33 · answer #9 · answered by DIRTY SAUSAGE 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2007-03-04 13:57:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋