English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

starvation in the world ..how about war and all violence?

2007-03-04 12:41:19 · 14 answers · asked by Louis 2 in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

No, but if the situation presented itself and I had to make a choice then yes because God is watching me.

2007-03-04 12:44:05 · answer #1 · answered by krumpmaster terrell 4 · 1 0

bill g isnt ritch ,real wealth is tied up in family trusts ,the real wealth owns trust shares
all expenses paid , family trusts ,swiss banks ,
the invisable men/women children ,they own the real estate getting shares returns rentals ,owning law firms ,countries im sick of hearing a computer nerd is the wealthiest man ,perhaps as a person he holds some shares ,but over the whole real wealth is unseen
a sharmarket fall would break his wealth
real wealth is hiden and secure ,who owns the diamond industry ,gold mines , petro chemical ,medicine industries ,auto industries ,arms industries ,ie the trusts hiding the ritches
who stole the wealth of the incas [80 percent of the worlds silver] 90 percent of the gold ,please gates is not really that wealthy
but he is using his wealth to heal the world not see it destroyed good on him he is trying

2007-03-04 12:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I could give up the money but to end all war and all violence is impossible by human beings.

2007-03-04 12:49:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If I had his money I'd have 2 countries build my patented Invention and become a TRILLIONAIRE and then I'd put my global-warming plan into operation by hireing ALL the homeless and the unemployed ALL over the WORLD. Then I'd put my new fire system into operation and reroute the fresh in all states so their wont be anymore floods and I'd put the HURRICANE PLAN into operation, the one that all the ocean GOVERNORS reused in 2000, then I'd put theSUNAMEE protector and expand theU.S.A. Then I'd get rid of ALL the GANGS,Then I'd rest.

2007-03-04 13:01:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, if it was that simple.
A cheaper way is to bring people to Jesus as God as the ultimate authority in everything including money which can't put an end to greed or violent natured people.

2007-03-04 12:50:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

there is not enough money to end all war and violence as long as certain religious factions are breeding hateful and murderous zealots who will stop at nothing, including money, to die for the cause.

2007-03-04 14:36:11 · answer #6 · answered by Mon-chu' 7 · 1 0

i think bill gates should decide on this question. he is best suited for it. i can not imagine myself in that role and in that wealth. so why lose more time -- dreaming or thinking. i give up. PS. i think bill gates is doing just that..he is slowly but surely giving it to the right causes, at least causes he believes in. let him continue to do that.
hope it helps, your curiosity.

2007-03-04 12:55:43 · answer #7 · answered by s t 6 · 0 0

I certainly wouldn't donate money to these worthless "charities" that claim to help people but do nothing but help themselves. I would instead actually PHYSICALLY go to these places and people that need help and deliver the money to the people who need it.

2007-03-04 12:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by Pashta 4 · 0 0

You could, it would do no good. It's like trying to grab your shoes and pick yourself up off the ground.

2007-03-04 12:44:39 · answer #9 · answered by mad_mav70 6 · 1 0

Every cent, and I would do my damnedest to convince others to do the same.

2007-03-08 07:47:31 · answer #10 · answered by presumedduggy 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers