That was about the only time I felt proud that he was my President. The 1998 bombing of Baghdad Iraq had some fishy timing with that scandel going on.
2007-03-04 11:53:43 · 20 answers · asked by Slow Poke 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah, right!
I could've asked if anybody was proud of Al Caida when 9/11 happened, but I didn't because I'm a human, you know, H U M A N.
No, I wasn't very happy to hear that Clinton and NATO decided to bombard my country and to kill Serbs.
You just don't get it! It's not us to molest all the people of the world, you got the wrong address when it comes to blaming Serbs! We're Christians just like you are, I think there's a real threat coming from the East.
Anyway, just like you're proud of your ex president, I'm proud to be Serb!!!!!
When will you learn that you can save your country only by defending it on your own land? Stop fighting someone else's wars!
Proud to be Serbian!!!!
2007-03-05 00:34:35 · answer #1 · answered by Jela 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually no I didn't. That was the UN begging us to take care of a problem for them. The US has been drawn into a lot of wars for the UN, I see how they reacted when we got attacked. The Baghdad bombing was in response to the planned assassination attempt on the previous President Bush, I had no problem with Clinton doing that. However once the troops were sent I backed them and the operation 100%.
2007-03-04 12:06:46 · answer #2 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. They were the only troops he had. The same troops that were sent into Afghanistan. Any military man will tell you it takes many years to change the quality and preparedness of the military.
George Bush fouught the Afghanistan combat with Clinton's army, and the Iraq conflict with weapons funded by Carter. If you're not too afraid to know the truth, look it up. If you are a neocon troll, please don't I wouldn't want you to ruin the perfection of ignorance that you display.
2007-03-04 12:27:09 · answer #3 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. and i did'n't approve when bush ordered the best troops in the world to kill the Iraqis. democrats and republicans are equally as rotten and corrupt and greedy and untruthful and bloodthirsty and immoral.
i am just sick of the people that end up getting elected to the office of the president. all of the presidents since william taft have been working for the bankers. its like when they get there, they are brainwashed into doing the bidding of satan or something. with one exception: john f kennedy.
2007-03-04 12:11:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, well done President Clinton. But European nations who love to complain about the USA did very little except wonder why more US troops where not there. That made me angry.
2007-03-04 12:03:49 · answer #5 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not "to kill the Serbs" but to save the lives of the Bosnian Muslims. In other words, to stop the genocide.
Are you against stopping the genocide?
.
2007-03-04 12:03:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny how there is a double standard with Democrats and Republicans. The only thing though is that we still have troops over there. For some reason people forget to remember that.
2007-03-04 12:09:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What a great idea Bill came up with!! ..Bomb the Christian Serbs and save the very peaceful Muslims that have never hurt anyone
2007-03-04 12:07:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The destruction of Yugoslavia was about the openning up of markets to be exploited by capitalism. If you're proud of that, you could also be proud of anyone who ever broke into a restaurant, killed the employess and left with a big bag of money.
2007-03-04 11:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by AZ123 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he made the right decision. Just like Bush did with Iraq and Afghanistan.
2007-03-04 12:01:16 · answer #10 · answered by Stan Darsh 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋