English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would so he can be the first minorty to be a president.As long as he does better than Bush.

2007-03-04 11:46:26 · 14 answers · asked by Mexichica01 2 in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

well yes i hope bill richardson wins. but he needs more publicity he has to become popular! i think he has alot of experience! he would become a great president! i agree with mike!

2007-03-05 06:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by carol 2 · 0 0

Bill Richardson has the best resume of any candidate for president.

House of Representatives (NM-3) 83-97
US Ambassador to the UN 97-98
US Secretary of Energy 98-01
Governor of NM 01-present

And he would be a great support in a growing Democratic region in the West / Southwest.

I would be proud to vote for him if he gets the Democratic nomination, but I am not supporting him in the primary.

2007-03-04 12:58:29 · answer #2 · answered by mykll42 2 · 1 0

Aside from Al Gore, Richardson is the best Democrat in 2008. He has no real negatives and plenty of experience. He is a successful governor, was Secretary of Energy and US ambassador to the UN. He can win in the West, can win the Hispanic vote and has no negatives (like Hillary or Obama.)
He is definitely my choice if Gore doesn't run.

2007-03-04 12:01:46 · answer #3 · answered by Matthew P 4 · 2 0

Just as I wouldn't vote against someone because of his race, so I would not vote FOR anyone simply because of his race. It's just not a good enough reason when it comes to electing a president. I think I'd be ok with voting for Richardson, as I recall when I lived in Colorado (he was NM governor) that he had some good things to say; I'd have to learn more, though.

2007-03-04 11:54:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

No. You flow to his website for Governor, and unlawful immigration can't be stumbled on everywhere, so it has NO precedence in his suggestions. James...you have a factor, besides the undeniable fact that it somewhat is irrelvant in this situation because of fact Richardson does not the two. 5 wrongs do not make a attractive. con...clueless...listed here are some explanation why we've an unlawful immigration situation. a million. They take low paying jobs...conserving DOWN PAY. 2. they don't pay taxes...in case you earn that little you do not could desire to regardless of in case you get an unlawful social protection form 3. people who DO steal an identity and pay taxes, get extra back than they pay in in the process the "earned income tax credit" 4. they're over represented in our prisons costing tax payer money. 5. they're milking the welfare device by using fraud. 6. they're getting loose guidance, costing us extra tax money. 7. They flow to the emergency room for scientific care because of fact they be attentive to that they gained't be refused, and WE PAY extra TAXES. 8. they're stealing from our economic device and sending it back to Mexico (they have not any perfect to be here, so they have not any perfect to artwork and take from our economic device) 9. lots of those coming here illegally are additionally bringing drugs. 10. WHAT component of unlawful DO YOU not comprehend? tom...not disrespecting your mom in any way...maximum of my kin, jointly with myself have fought to grant your mom the impressive to wood, yet what makes her a good source?

2016-10-17 06:57:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Kinda stupid to vote for someone just beacause of thier race. Oh, but could that be considered racist? When can we just consider ourselves Americans and not Mexi-American or African American or whatever. Why the hell can't I be called European American. Or would that be stupid since my parents and grandparents were born here, or just because I'm white, like it's racist for white people to be proud of who they are. And, uh, yeah, Bill Richardson seems like a decent canidate....

2007-03-04 12:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by Azalea 4 · 2 0

Bill Richardson is great. A moderate candidate from a western state who didn't use negative campaighn ads. Matter of fact, I actually watched on purpose because his ads were so clever.

2007-03-04 11:51:05 · answer #7 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 4 0

Kucinich is the best choice for President. Bill Richardson could just be an alternative.

2007-03-04 11:50:30 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 4 1

And why in the world did you have to throw in the "Mexican-American" bit? Totally unnecessary and racist. Why don't we talk about philosophy and qualifications instead? Wouldn't it be nice if the trolls would stop so we could have an intelligent discussion?

2007-03-04 11:57:48 · answer #9 · answered by John H 6 · 4 0

I thought you meant the Mayor of Salt Lake City who is an impeach Bush republican

I'm going with Rodham Clinton

2007-03-04 11:55:10 · answer #10 · answered by treonbarleyverdery 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers