Why was the main issue being put on the table that MINORITIES could not afford it ? Why is this an issue. Its a paid programing it isnt free, If they cant afford it the radio is free they can access that.
I think the merger is a good thing. If they dont allow the merger the cost per month will just go up. Then how will they afford it. I have both services so It would just be more user friendly.
2007-03-04
11:41:26
·
2 answers
·
asked by
tammer
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
I listened to the debates on Cable and all i kept hearing are the senators that were worried about the minorities not being able to afford it. the price will go up either way so I dont understand what it matters, and its not a subscription you HAVE to buy.... its a choice, there are only 2 companies now that carry it, It would make the subscribers like me that buy both, beable to access all chanells thru one.
2007-03-04
22:04:03 ·
update #1
And honestly how many that listen to these service daily will still keep it if it raises in price. I will. Everything raises in price and we accept it, like gas, food, heating costs. Those we DONT have a choice on , On our listening choice we chose FREE or subscription.
2007-03-04
22:08:49 ·
update #2