English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is for football season ...for a half-time show

2007-03-04 11:04:50 · 10 answers · asked by crazyflower1988 1 in Entertainment & Music Music

10 answers

Los Fabulosos Cadillacs - El Matador

Yeah baby!

2007-03-04 11:08:06 · answer #1 · answered by pepper 7 · 0 0

Traditional stuff, like John Phillips Sousa (spelling), is always popular. Chicago, Queen, or Blood, Sweat and Tears are contemporary bands you might look at. Good luck.

2007-03-04 11:14:40 · answer #2 · answered by bullwinkle 5 · 0 0

If you're into retro, nearly anything by Chicago makes for a great tune and is readily transposed. We played a lot of Chicago in my college band. But you have to have trumpets that can scream at the high "C" readily.

2007-03-04 11:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Im not sure if your band would be allowed to do these songs but check out gwen stefani she ALWAYS has songs that have a really easy and steady beat to them

2007-03-04 11:07:06 · answer #4 · answered by zee 3 · 0 0

Well a good marching song is star spar kin banner for are nation

2007-03-04 11:07:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i assume so, yet you should even "attempt too stressful" to write a sturdy united states of america music. in case you do not rather understand the thank you to make a sturdy united states of america music, you're sure to write cliches with the intention to pump one out. comparable ingredient is going for prog or different "complicated" music (Dream Theater particularly is crammed with "prog cliches"). i'm thinking now that "technical" is maybe an inherently destructive term, because it implies bands that are in simple terms "technically" crafting music, "entering into the process the motions", in case you will. this does not inevitably mean it must be very complicated, yet is probable immaculately performed and intensely cliche... in actuality i don't think of the term has a lot use, particularly. A) Dream Theater (all too many times), and noticeably a lot each and every "tech/neo-classical steel" band strikes me as music college sportsmanship. B) i don't think of you are able to say that those bands "do not attempt stressful adequate" because of the fact who is conscious in the event that they're *attempting* to be something specially... yet as for bands that get mislabeled prog... Muse, Radiohead, any "post rock" bands... properly, besides, relies upon on your definition of prog. C) Any of those, at their suited, very thoroughly pull off "progressive dispositions" in music: King pink, Genesis, specific, ELP, Jethro Tull, pink Floyd, Camel, Transatlantic, Porcupine Tree etc. BQ: It replace into the Neo-Classical Tech-steel in 9/8 to Erowid's aimless, nondescript Psych jams... my Q&A's may well be like an ELO music; i'm getting my ingredient for the duration of yet on occasion on the price of soul and endearing blunders. @Gesm: Van der Graaf is extra... "emotive" than GG yet has a lot extra "wankery" too. GG in no way got down to be all that resonant, yet imo they gain their applications extra thoroughly than VDGG, by and enormous.

2016-12-18 05:42:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We got the beat!!! I like this 80's song.

2007-03-04 11:10:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

QUEEN! They're awesome. They have pretty awesome beats too. OR you could do a remix of the Mario Bro's theme music. That'd be pretty awesome too.

2007-03-04 11:08:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

land of make believe

very good

2007-03-04 11:07:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

pirates of the carribean.... well, its like five pages long, and so you can really *march* to it, if you know...

2007-03-04 11:07:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers