If state and religion are separate why do people have to swear on the Bible in court?

Answer 1

Some courts, but not all, still have witnesses swear on a bible. Others merely have a person raise their right hand a aver to tell the truth.

Answer 2

sadly you no longer have to swear on the bible if you dont want to. you can just take the oath without the bible, or swear on something else.

As an aside, the constitution doesnt actually say that there must be a separation of church and state. What it says is "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" This just means the federal government (Congress) cant pass laws interfering with religion. States were free to act as they saw fit.

The court later ruled that the 14th amendment, which was passed after the civil war to give freed slaves citizenship and make sure they were treated equally under the law, meant that states couldnt pass laws infringing in religion. The relevant text of that amendment says "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;" How the court decided that provision meant freedom of speech, religion, birth control, abortion, and several other things I cant explain.

Answer 3

You are asked to Swear on a HOLY-BOOK of your preferred Faith in the belief that The divine retribution will be visited upon the Party who knowing misleads the Court and Lies-or omits details -about a Crime Planned or commited .

Answer 4

i think of it incredibly is ~80 5% of u.s. that identifies itself as christian. something like 20% become attentive to themselves as evangelicals. That 20% is, in the path of the presidency and the help of this final congress, determining the social coverage for the rest persons. i do no longer possibly have a situation with the words decrease than God being the pledge of allegience or the words God Bless u.s.. i think of that comes extra from the loose Mason ingredient of issues and much less from the non secular ingredient of issues. in case you look at the writings of Thomas Jefferson you will see what I propose. He fairly had no admire for prepared faith. the priority that I incredibly have with Church and State is that the morality of the few isn't the morality of the full. Making rules consistent with this fake, tightly generic morale view (that maximum of those christians in potential look to forget approximately approximately their entertainment. Take Pat Robertson and his embezzeling funds out of his charity) to manage maximum folk is going against each little thing the form stands for. My morales are actually not their morales and in accordance to the form rules will no longer be able to be made to result this. I wish i will make a extra coherent argument yet I basically wakened and am rambling now.

Answer 5

Once again, tell me where the words separation of church and state are in our constitution. Don't say the 1st amendment because it is not their. Once again the idea behind the term" seperation of church and state" is to keep the government out of the church , not the church out of government.

Answer 6

you can swear in just with your hand up. but you can swear on the Koran if you are Muslim.

It just started out that way here because it didn't offend anyone and most everyone was Christian.

Answer 7

Using the Bible is not obligatory.


.

Answer 8

Good question

Answer 9

-They don't and people who are being sworn into a political office don't either - although they often do voluntarily.

Answer 10

They don't.