We know that before she started the drug use and had an intimate relationship with her money grabbing sleaz-o lawyer Howard K Stern, she wanted to be burried next to Marilyn Monroe next to the stars. She was an American celebrity that loved her fans more than anything (other than her son) and had an OK relationship with her family. I would like to quote her when she said "My life in texas was pretty good but it looks a lot better in the review mirror"
I believe that Anna loved her mother and her family, but her aspirations were bigger than the love she had for her family which caused her a void that could not be filled in her life, which is why she turned to drugs especially after her husband died which left her lost in life. She was vulnerable and this man, Howard K. Stern took advantage of her dysfunctional life and her childlike niavety as someone that he could control, manipulate, and use as a means of income. Anna was not in her right mind in the last months of her life!
2007-03-04 10:47:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
OF COURSE THEY SHOULD BE RE-BURIED!! Daniel should have been buried in California so that Anna could be with the other stars, like she wanted to be in the first place. The only reason she/they ended up in The Bahamas was because, there, she and Howard could falsify Dannielynn's birth certificate. By putting down Howard as the father, no one could challenge that, they thought.
2007-03-04 14:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My concern is that as those bodies decompose, all the drugs that will run-off and seep into the soil-
Really though- Anna was famous for Guess Jeans, Playboy and her reality show- that's about it- except for marrying and exploiting that old billionaire (does that really strike anyone as having been about true love)?
And just like she exploited that old man, what comes around goes around- in her case rather quickly- with Howard K. Stern.
2007-03-04 18:54:21 · answer #2 · answered by pavano_carl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't matter... If she loved the bahamas (sp?) and wanted to bury her child there, they both deserve to be there...
It was her life and she chose where to bury her son, which is her right as a mother. And she wanted to be buried there, as well.
Personally? I don't think that so many people should be fighting over where to bury her. She is where she loved to be and that should be that. Having her buried in another spot won't bring her back.
2007-03-04 20:00:51 · answer #3 · answered by itskatyo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Anna and her son should stay right where they are because that's where she wanted to be.
2007-03-04 22:27:02 · answer #4 · answered by happyme19672003 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-one should be Hurried in California.
2007-03-04 18:50:41 · answer #5 · answered by christian b 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no matter where the bodies are, god has already taken their souls.
2007-03-04 19:08:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋