You didn't really think they'd own up to it did you? No one needs to give them sources as the list would be to long! I think it's outright dangerous that they let their hate for Bush cause them to actually want to see our country fail! They even make Saddam, Hitler, a BinLaden out to be better than President Bush. This says something right there!
2007-03-04 10:43:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
It started with the republicans during the Clinton years- when it was all about hating Clinton, irregardless of anything else- and now the Democrats have just carried it over into the Bush years.
Partisianship just gets worse by the year- where political party is more important than principle.
2007-03-04 10:38:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by pavano_carl 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Name one Democrat who sides with the terrorists.
2007-03-04 10:35:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by JJB 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
no longer all Nazis worked for him out of decision. each and every each and every now and then they have been forced to and in the event that they refused they have been shot. Now, if that individual who replaced into being forced to be a Nazi had a HUMONGOUS coronary heart, then they could provide up their lives quite than being a Nazi. yet i'm afriad no longer many did. countless human beings additionally agreed with Hitler. They thought their faith replaced into the only one. The humorous subject is, nevertheless, Hitler and a lot of Nazis thought the only people who deserved to stay had to have blond hair and blue eyes-yet Hitler did no longer have blond hair OR blue eyes and that i will guess lots of the Nazis did no longer, the two. yet it isn't the component. the component is, human beings thought that God did no longer choose gays to stay, that Jews had a "undesirable" and "unusual" faith, and that preists weren't meant to stay. None of it fairly is real, nevertheless, yet yet another component is, the conflict is long over, and that i'm easily happy that's! think of of each and every of the people who suffered for no reason in any respect. the worldwide does no longer be the comparable without one in all those folk we've-it could be plenty worse.
2016-10-02 09:32:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
completely different scenarios....Hitler was committing genocide, terrorists are waging a "holy" war(if there is such a thing)...
name one Dem that sides with terrorists...i do not side with terrorists but i am against bush because he lied to us and to congress and now tens of thousands of innocent people are dying because of it...
Iraq did not attack us, Al Queda did...in case you have forgotten...it's like the American government has ADD or something..it seems hard for them to concentrate on the matter at hand without flipping somewhere else and blaming them.
2007-03-04 11:03:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paulien 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
to Joe S;
the ones that say "no profiling is allowed in any public place", which is pretty much anyone in the ACLU, which is pretty much full of Liberal Democrats who believe all people should be stripped of all things that make people unique..
*btw the above comment is made specifically to the randomness of airport checks (which are'nt very random)*...Why I as a business employee should be scanned at a checkpoint b/c I just bought my ticket 10 minutes is assinine, guess I dont look enough like a terrorist, then they would allow me through b/c theyd' be afraid of hurting my feelings..
but I'm not a republican, so I could care less.
2 pts
2007-03-04 10:39:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by m34tba11 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
During WW II we were fight a known enemy in Germany, Japan and Italy. Please site names of Democrats who side with the terrorists? Typical routine to accuse one of being unpatriotic because they disagree with Bush and company.
2007-03-04 10:41:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No democrats side with terrorists but Bush's family sided with the Nazi what's wrong you never heard of Presott Bush Nazi sympathizer?
I see a thumbs down for telling the truth is the conservative way, well read and weep as they say in poker
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
2007-03-04 10:37:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
no we're not - this is just another despicable tactic used by desperate neo-cons as their president and his administration are crashing down under the weight of their own incompetency.
Only the feeble-minded and those who truly hate free speech would utter such stupidity. I find it ironic but hardly surprising that the Neo-cons display more of an anti-American attitude in their blind "patriotism" than liberals do in their criticism of the policies of an unpopular administration.
2007-03-04 11:09:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by samurai_dave 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well... there were quite a few... the American Bund Party and Charles Lindberg are just off the top of my head...
There is no logical explaination to this :P
2007-03-04 11:31:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by mariner31 7
·
0⤊
0⤋