you only have to watch the wtc come down to know without doubt it was an implosion.yes
2007-03-04 10:14:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by TOM 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
Well, when one looks at the closer views of the event, one can plainly see that at least one of those buildings was unzipping from the top down. Demolitions don't work that way.
However, I would suggest that you consider the implications of that particular myth. It implies that many scores of individuals in and outside of our government, probably involving several federal agencies, conspired to plant explosives in the base of both buildings and then arranged for two commercial aircraft to fly into them before the charges were remotely detonated. I submit to you that the US government is logistically incapable of keeping a secret like that. Hell, Nixon couldn't even keep the lid on a common burglary.
Do you honestly believe that the Bush administration is capable of coming up with a conspiracy that perfect and airtight? When has the administration ever shown that kind of competence? I would have to say that such a proposition would require a suspension of disbelief that is irrational.
2007-03-04 10:22:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by neoimperialistxxi 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
in accordance to the direction at which the planes travelled, it somewhat is very not likely that the 'terrorists' the government stated that have been piloting those planes could have performed those maneuvers alongside the expert 'flight direction' replaced into stated to have befell. it is likewise in simple terms astounding how long they have been waiting to stay interior the air, with out any planes being scrambled to intercept them. besides the undeniable fact that it had to be actual, after all, there replaced right into a passport of one of the pilots that flew out of the window unscathed from the collision and fireball and all a thank you to the floor!
2016-10-17 06:45:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by pape 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Demolition in the form of a big tower beside it collapsing, yes. Human-controlled explosives, no.
2007-03-04 10:11:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
The idea that the terrorists' attacks on 9/11/01, were faked, or done by the Jews (who all stayed home that day) is ridiculous. If you look at other attacks, like Pearl Harbor, or the JFK assassination, you will see there are people who try to make things complicated. It may be from the belief that no one could do this to us unless we let them, or did it to ourselves.
2007-03-04 10:12:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by lestermount 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
When I watched it come down it fell at an angle and kinda folded a little in the middle. We were told that it had been weakened by the Twin Towers. There was no explosion sounds and parts fell off a little at a time. I do not believe it was blown up. No one was in it so what would be the point?
2007-03-04 10:11:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
No. Regardless of what the conspiracy nuts say, no. And I hardly think a video posted on YouTube is a good reference.
Thanks for the two points.
2007-03-04 11:55:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Team Chief 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
There will always be nutbags like you and we cannot convince everyone of the truth, that psycho arabs attacked america on 9/11. heck, polls show that 5% of americans believe the moon landing was faked! yeah, neil armstrong and buzz aldren were in a studio in CA doing the whole thing.
2007-03-04 10:15:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Matt 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
YES IT IS POSSIBLE. IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE THAT ALIENS FROM THE FUTURE CAME BACK IN TIME AND DEMOLISHED IT WITH THEIR MXB-17L DESTRUCTO DEVICE
But it's not likely.
2007-03-04 10:08:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Larry Silverstein ---the man who owns the buildings said it was!
Here's that video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
His words!
2007-03-04 10:19:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋