Maybe the Police are afraid that the BBC will fly Air Planes into Police Head Quarters.
After all, if the BBC knew about things before they occured, wouldn't that mean the BBC planned and carried out the attacks ?
Since the BBC is a leftest new organization, does that mean Liberals are behind 9/11 ?
After all, we didn't hear FOX News reporting stuff before it happened, now did we?
2007-03-04 09:58:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I've watched it and it is pretty strange that the reporter on the monitor NEVER mentions the building as teh Salomon Brothers building or WTC7. She just refers to the collapse of the towers and the Marriot. It's like the studio guy and the woman are talking about different things. Like they were spliced together into a phony video strip.
I'd like someone familiar with the BBC to say if they recognize the studio person as someone who actually broadcasts for the BBC.
2007-03-04 09:56:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you have ever been in touch in a small scale incident that contains deaths or destruction you may desire to comprehend the quantity of advice that comes out of the scene. it fairly isn't any longer all precise. it rather is now and back incorrect. while somebody says "it could fall down" it fairly is going to become a chinese language whisper. (ie "it has collapsed"). they could have basically have been given puzzled interior the warmth of the 2d and thought the development could desire to be in another place. it rather is a properly user-friendly fact that steel performs very badly in fires. Structural engineers have user-friendly for years that an unprotected wood shape performs greater advantageous than a unprotected steel one in the time of a fire. in case you think of the BBC extra down the twin towers and attempted to conceal it up there is not any longer plenty which will replace your thoughts. shop looking on the celebrities the certainty is on the industry, or perhaps it fairly is on your head...
2016-09-30 05:03:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by truesdale 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't change the past... There IS a delay between the us and British feed, and since when has YouTube.com become the leading and foremost authority on 9/11/01? Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see, especially when it is related to a bogus conspiracy theory on the internet, 6 years after the fact!!
PS: I DID watch the clip and quite frankly there looks to be a bit of "Doctoring" involved.
Hey, we're in the US, and free to disagree.... don't lose sight of that FACT!
2007-03-04 10:09:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Porterhouse 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not sure about the delay in the 'feed' from the US to the UK.
I was on the phone to my friend who lives 160 or so miles west of Detroit while watching a live RedWings hockey game on Tv .
She was watching the same game.
What I saw and heard , I was seeing and hearing a full 4 seconds BEFORE she did.
I am in the UK.
2007-03-07 17:07:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by knowitall 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is so much shrouded in mystery I should imagine there is a lot more that has gone on that we will ever find out about this issue!! this the western world that is supposed to be the riteous truthful part of the planet!!!
2007-03-05 01:43:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by leopardshaz 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Imagine that maybe the truth is not to ever be told. There is probally a secret classified document that only a few authorities have and it is untouchable.
2007-03-05 02:17:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it isn't true! The Youtube clip was edited!
2007-03-04 09:54:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
there is a 20 min delay from there to here
2007-03-04 09:54:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i cant believe people are trying to blame it on a delay between America and the UK that makes no sense at all, would someone that has said that please explain.
2007-03-04 12:36:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by bill 5
·
0⤊
0⤋