No, while he is a total egotistical premadonna, he doesn't have any illegal off-field issues as many player do ---that can always be said about him. If anyone should be kicked out, it should be Pacman Jones and Chris Henry (and Albert Haynesworth ---only 5 games for stepping on a guy's face?!!)
And the HoF "rules" state that off-field issues should not be taken into account (LT was a coke head but a great player). However, I think TO's "antics" WILL still be taken into account (as the guys who elect the HoFers are EXTREMELY bias and I'm sure the stubborn old farts who do it now will still be alive come the time TO's elligible. Play wise he should eventually get into the HoF).
2007-03-04 10:04:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Andy T 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You can't banish people just because you don't like their attitude or behavior.
NFL history is littered with rebels and big mouths, some in the hall, some not.
If it wasn't for the media following him around and reporting every tiny little thing he does, he wouldn't be half the villian he is portrayed as.
He doesn't really do anything more now than other players do all over the league, it's just the other players don't have a crowd of reporters on their heels no matter where they go.
In Philadelphia, he was a huge distraction and the team acted accordingly.
With Dallas, despite the fact he rode a exercise bike all through training camp, he did everything that was asked of him and played with a broken hand besides.
Do I like his attitude and some of his behavior? no I don't.
But there are alot of people I feel that way about.
I'm not sure T.O. is even HOF material anyway.
2007-03-04 19:14:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr R 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What has T.O. done to deserve either of those things? He is a disctraction to his team but it's not like he's out their getting into trouble and involved in shootings. If anyone should get kicked out of the NFL it's all the players who have been arrested and charged with numberous crimes. As far as the Hall of Fame is concerned I think T.O. needs a few more great seasons plus a championship in order to be considered for the Hall. If that happes I don't think his personality will keep him out as controversial guys like Michael Irvin have already been inducted.
2007-03-04 17:57:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Manny 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. TO has not done anything to be kicked out of the NFL and out of the Hall of Fame. But to perfectly frank with you, TO has not done anything on the field that says he should be in the Hall after he eventually retires.
2007-03-04 19:15:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by xslider.geo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he shouldnt be kicked out the NFL. As much as I hate T.O. there are guys like...uh... Pacman Jones and the Bengal player that keep getting in trouble that deserve to be kicked out alot more than T.O. T.O. however, wont go to the H.O.F because the people that vote on it dont like him.
2007-03-04 18:06:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by MJMGrand 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
We all know that Terrell Owens is a self-centered git, but he hasn't done anything illegal. If you're going to start kicking people out of the league, those 9 Bungles and Pacman Jones, who seem to have difficulty abiding the law, should be top of the list, not Owens.
Cheers!
2007-03-04 19:54:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Steel Empress 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...so he runs his mouth and does a lot of stupid things, but nothing to warrant his removal from the NFL or the Hall of Fame. It's not like he killed someone.
2007-03-04 17:55:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by iamhags 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
no as much as i dislike him you cant kick someone out for being a selfish,selfabsorbed big mouth as for the hall if his stats are good enough you probally gotta put him in but there not good enough yet plus until they put in art monk screw the hall
2007-03-04 18:35:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Billy S 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why because you don't like him? Hell if we kick out T.O. then we better kick out "Ocho Cinco" or whatever other dumb thing Chad Johnson wants to call himself.
2007-03-04 18:07:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely.
2007-03-04 19:02:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
2⤋