English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070304/pl_nm/people_coulter_dc

I think that intelligent people can agree- "joking" or not, if you use an epithet or a slur (no, "troll" isn't one, unless you can tell me what group it refers to), you don't get to be a talking head anymore. I thought if enough people ignored this wench, she would go away. I never imagined she'd go straight up Tim Hardaway on national television. Can we agree that no matter which way she leans, her "insight" is no longer wanted?

2007-03-04 09:34:25 · 3 answers · asked by Schmorgen 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Nick- She didn't use "a bad word" she used a "slur." There is a big difference. It is not okay to say that word. I don't care if she was talking about Bush. As for her political stance, it's hard to pin down:

Assassinate a Supreme Court Justice (rimshot).

Kill or convert all muslims (funny stuff).

9/11 widows aren't Repub enough, so they are all evil women who "enjoy" their husband's deaths.

I don't see politics in any of that. Just stupidity.

2007-03-04 09:45:48 · update #1

3 answers

i hope so. she makes money through hate and lies.

2007-03-04 09:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by b 5 · 1 0

So she called him a cigarette, so what? I'm sure she will be around a long time as long as there are people that agree with her. The wish of other to silence is not just cause to do so.

2007-03-04 09:40:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

No, yes, maybe.

What kind of rant is this?

Are you trying to discuss something she said specifically? Could you please argue her political stances, or are you just upset that she used a bad word when talking about one of your liberal heros?

2007-03-04 09:40:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers